User talk:Blacknuz

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Tsw 360.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Tsw 360.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 21:20, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Amarula Tree

A tag has been placed on Amarula Tree requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Ziggy Saw dust 19:13, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Debris (album)

An article that you have been involved in editing, Debris (album), has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Debris (album). Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? - CobaltBlueTony™ _talk 16:38, 25 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Killing My Darlings

I have nominated Killing My Darlings, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Killing My Darlings. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 22:27, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Pokemon Go Edit

Hey!

While I understand why you made this edit I need to explain why the usage of "worldwide".

Per WP:VG/GL releases in the lede are kept very general, as it says in the linked project page there "In the article lead, release dates should be summarized to be as general as possible, avoiding specific mention of platform and region releases unless significant. Whenever possible, the release dates in the lead should be summarized to the year of release, or month and year if further applicable.".

Since we know the game will be out by the end of the month, "worldwide" is preferred as we know for a fact that it will be released worldwide in July. This follows guidelines and keeps things nice and tidy.

I hope this helps you understand why this has been done. Rgoodermote (talk) 04:45, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

September 2018

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Too Close for Comfort Tour. Block evasion by User:Danieleb82, Binksternet (talk) 04:32, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The Iron Throne (Game of Thrones)

I just undid your edit claiming the runtime was 75 minutes. I saw your screenshot showing a streaming runtime of 75 minutes, but even if it was a legitimate source it's clearly not from any English-speaking country, much less the U.S. Foreign broadcasts of a show like GoT may be edited to meet local censorship standards. Also, broadcasts in PAL or SECAM territories of material shot at 24 fps (the usual frame rate of film) may be shortened by "PAL speedup", or playback at 25 fps (about 4% faster) to match PAL/SECAM frame rates of 25/50 fps; that is not a significant issue with broadcasts at NTSC frame rates of 30/60 fps. Because of those factors, runtime reports for U.S. shows from outside the U.S. are likely to be unreliable. Thus, the previously reported runtime of 82 minutes should stand unless & until a reliable source with access to HBO in the U.S. is found. --RBBrittain (talk) 05:29, 20 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

February 2020

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 12:36, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Blacknuz (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Check This IP block request. I sincerely hope I'll get unblocked since I wouldn't want to lose this account I've had for almost half my life for something I'm innocent of. I've been editing Wikipedia for so long and only had these troubles the last two years simply because of a coincidence Blacknuz (talk) 04:44, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

There is technical information to support this block, so you are going to need to go into more detail about this coincidence and explain why we think you are a sock and evading a block if you aren't. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 10:00, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Blacknuz (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm not sure what you want from me. How do I prove I am who I am? Is it even possible? Would I have been blocked if I were from another country? Are you going to block everyone from Sweden making small changes? I don't really see the logic that User:Danieleb82 and I should even be the same person other than the fact that he's been using Swedish IPs to go around blocking, which feels like stretching to me. I also fail to see the logic in a simple troll vandalising Wikipedia for over a decade (my account is from 2007, his from 2018). I never had any problem with blocks and warnings until 2018, that means I (apparently) handled myself fine for 11 years before. My biggest problem is good faith edits where I don't use (or forget) sources. If it helps I have the same username on several other sites (Last.fm, The Backloggery, Overclocked Remix, Bandcamp (all possible to find with a simple googling)) which, in my opinion, makes me seem more like a serious user. If I google "Danieleb82" I only get the sockpuppet investigation from this site. I'm not sure what I can do more to plead my case. Oh, except for the fact that I even bother which Danieleb82 never did. I am truly serious and genuine. I've never been banned from something before and I wouldn't want it to be for something I didn't do. If there's anything more I can do, just tell me, because I don't know anymore. Blacknuz (talk) 05:44, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Accept reason:

For whatever reason, the blocks I do tend to sit in the unblock queue forever. So, I'm just going to unblock you and see what happens. Please don't edit war while logged out. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 06:41, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

To prevent a "chicken or the egg" situation (people refuse to unblock your IP because your account is blocked, and people refuse to unblock your account because your IP is blocked), I've changed your block to be no longer be a checkuser block. That allows any admin to overrule this block and unblock you. If you're not Danieleb82, I'm not really sure what to say. What's going on at articles like Too Close for Comfort Tour? NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 22:55, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You'd have to ask User:Binksternet about that, but my guess is that he only reverted because of the same suspicion then and I just were really stubborn since I knew the grammatical changes were correct. There's not much else to it really. Blacknuz (talk) 04:56, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry to have caused so much trouble.

In September 2018 I was keeping half an eye out for Swedish IPs because of disruption and block evasion by Danieleb82, and on an article I was busy protecting from a Kentish person's disruption I saw this change by IP 85.24.216.217 which turned out not to be from Kent, UK, but from Sweden. I assumed at the time it was Danieleb82 simply because it was a music article and the IP was Swedish. I did not know it was Blacknuz editing while logged out. Another involved IP is 85.24.216.184 which was blocked two weeks ago. Both of these IPs are from Karlskoga while Danieleb82 is usually using Stockholm IPs such as the blocked range Special:Contributions/83.185.32.0/20. Note that Blacknuz was registered as a username nearly ten years before Danieleb82. Binksternet (talk) 05:31, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Trail of Tears (band), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jonathan Pérez. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:23, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:39, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Metallica

Greetings. Please explain why you are changing the order of the songwriting credits on Metallica albums. Mac Dreamstate (talk) 12:07, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sure he thought that the songwriting credits are always ordered in alphabetical order. EduKor (talk) 12:24, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Exactly this. I just don't see the logic in them being credited in different orders. Blacknuz (talk) 05:05, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The logic is that we credit them exactly as they appear in the official material, in this case the liner notes. Mac Dreamstate (talk) 14:13, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]