User talk:Blackinformant15

Your submission at Articles for creation: Brandywine Workshop & Archives (July 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MatthewVanitas was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Brandywine Workshop & Archives and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MatthewVanitas (talk) 13:21, 4 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Brandywna, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! MatthewVanitas (talk) 13:21, 4 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You must modify your username

Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your username, "Brandywna", may not comply with our username policy. Please note that you may not use a username that represents the name of a company, group, organization, product, or website. Examples of usernames that are not allowed include "XYZ Company", "MyWidgetsUSA.com", and "Trammel Museum of Art". However, you are invited to use a username that contains such a name if it identifies you personally, such as "Mark at WidgetsUSA", "Jack Smith at the XY Foundation", and "WidgetFan87".

Please also note that Wikipedia does not allow accounts to be shared by multiple people, and that you may not advocate for or promote any company, group, organization, product, or website, regardless of your username. Moreover, I recommend that you read our conflict of interest guideline. If you are a single individual and are willing to contribute to Wikipedia in an unbiased manner, please create a new account or request a username change that complies with our username policy. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. Thank you.

I hope I am not posting this comment a second time but I couldn't tell if I posted on my own talk page or the general talk page or my editor's talk page, so just in case:

My editor left this comment, "Large sections remain unreferenced. The article appears to be copy-pasted from somewhere but I haven't been able to identify the source". I don't really understand because I cited any direct quotes and anything else is information that I got from one of my listed references. I also did not copy and paste the information in the article. However, I did use complicated sentence structuring and I know the history portion reads sort of like a story. If it helps, I can try to simplify my writing and stick to listing the facts.

Blackinformant15 (talk) 00:36, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

confused about edits

I hope I am not posting this comment a second time but I couldn't tell if I posted on my own talk page or the general talk page or my editor's talk page, so just in case:

My editor left this comment, "Large sections remain unreferenced. The article appears to be copy-pasted from somewhere but I haven't been able to identify the source". I don't really understand because I cited any direct quotes and anything else is information that I got from one of my listed references. I also did not copy and paste the information in the article. However, I did use complicated sentence structuring and I know the history portion reads sort of like a story. If it helps, I can try to simplify my writing and stick to listing the facts.

Blackinformant15 (talk) 14:54, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Brandywine Workshop & Archives (March 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by LaMona was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment they left was:

Huge sections of this are unsourced. You cannot include any information that is not verifiable in third-party sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Brandywine Workshop & Archives and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

LaMona (talk) 16:44, 17 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Blackinformant15, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! LaMona (talk) 16:44, 17 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Brandywine Workshop & Archives

Hello, Blackinformant15. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Brandywine Workshop & Archives".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. TopCipher (talk) 14:24, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]