User talk:Blackcatuk

Canada: A People's History

I am planning to expand the content on all newly created articles of Canada: a people's history episodes. Please do not put deletion tags on. Daniel Hu 17:20, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

I tried my best

If you still think the article Chaotic Trading Card Game is still unsuitable, please tell me the possible improvements I can make. But I make no promises, for if I can't find the info that you feel needs to be in the article, you are going to have to compromise. BTW, some vandal removed your caption.Worlder 02:55, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

Johnny Knorr

I received your message, and am trying to meet the guidelines. Unfortunately, I have not visited Wikipedia long enought o know where to put the verifiable information. Sould you please advise...Thanks

Thanks for your help. I think I have made the appropriate changes. Please let me know what you think. Thanks, knorrphotography

Micro-Blaze

I submitted this page about Micro-blaze because I do not work for the manufacturer that produces it and have used this beneficial, environmentally friendly, cost-saving product under several different employers. To those that question this article's validity and use, I pose a counter question: How can Wikipedia have an article about Coca-cola and not Micro-blaze, if it follows the same format and informative nature?

Micro-Blaze, though perhaps not publicly or commercially well-known, is used widely throughout the Oil& Gas Industry, the general Firefighting community, and by the US military and its support contractors all over the world, especially in the Middle East.

Please visit the article for coca-cola product and differentiate it from the brief article I began on Micro-Blaze or vice-versa.

I need help on an article, know anyone who can read Danish at least?

The reason is that I am doing an article about Taynikma. If you just look at the article you see that is very thin and most likely up for speedy deletion. However it is not my fault, as I never read those graphic novels nor can I read Danish. I require assistance on this article, that is why I placed a stub template there. Please note the Danish Wikipedia has an article on Taynikma and I made a link to the official site hoping someone who can read Danish to fill in the gaps within the article.Worlder 23:16, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Image:Andersonshelter.jpg

A tag has been placed on Image:Andersonshelter.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I8 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is available as a bit-for-bit identical copy on the Wikimedia Commons under the same name, or all references to the image on Wikipedia have been updated to point to the title used at Commons.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Image:Andersonshelter.jpg|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Sdrtirs (talk) 10:45, 2 August 2008 (UTC)

Survey for new page patrollers

New page patrol – Survey Invitation Hello Blackcatuk! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you. If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only. If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it. Please click HERE to take part. Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback. You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of Wiki Media Foundation at 11:44, 25 October 2011 (UTC).

Notification of automated file description generation

Your upload of File:Blackcatuk.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 13:36, 9 February 2014 (UTC)

File:Blackcatuk.jpg missing description details

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as:

• File:Blackcatuk.jpg

is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 04:38, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

New deal for page patrollers

Hi Blackcatuk,

In order to better control the quality of new pages, keep out the spam, and welcome the genuine newbies, the current system we introduced in 2011 is being updated and improved. The documentation and tutorials have also been revised and given a facelift. Most importantly a new user group New Page Reviewer has been created.

Under the new rule, you may find that you are temporarily unable to mark new pages as reviewed. However, this is nothing to worry about - most current experienced patrollers are being accorded the the new right without the need to apply, and if you have significant previous experience of patrolling new pages, we strongly encourage you to apply for the new right as soon as possible - we need all the help we can get, and we are now providing a dynamic, supportive environment for your work.

Find out more about this exiting new user right now at New Page Reviewers and be sure to read the new tutorial before applying. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:29, 13 November 2016 (UTC)