User talk:Black Stripe
|
Thanks for your acknowledgment
[edit]You wrote: Just wanted to say thanks so much for helping out on the Bongo (antelope) article I'm working on. I'm new to this so please help out as much as you can! You bet, my buddy. You have done a great job! See you soon. --Rednblu 20:35, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
Wow!
[edit]I'm a wikipedian and I haven't seen wikipedia for a while. I edited the article Bongo (antelope) a lot and wow! You've really shown effort as a new wikipedian! One more thing. You need to organize each part of the article better. But overall, wow! I give you an A! Nice work! I am not trying to get your personal info. but what grade are you in? Himanyo 01:55, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
Inline references
[edit]See here:WP:CITE and here:WP:CITET for info about how to produce inline references. Michael Jordan, an article that I'm the main contributor/writer on, has correct referencing style, you could just copy the methods used there. I can't really add the references myself because that would require me to learn and read all the info about the animal. Maybe you can just show me each source and I'll teach you how to add them. Quadzilla99 02:02, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
Bongo FAC
[edit]As for the Bongo FAC,it's much better. I just ran AndyZ's PR script and put it on the talk page. You should work through it, the script is pretty good, but has a few bugs. Someone will probably tell you to get rid of the gallery, work the pics into appropriate sections of the body. As for refs, you need to tie them to pertinent body sections and footnote them. I'm teach you. We'll start with web refs, tell me what web refs apply to what lines of the body, and I'll footnote them for you. A ref can be used more than once. let's put all our talk on the bongo thread you started on my talk page, that way we're not bouncing back and forth. Rlevse 02:12, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
I've rechecked and I am happy with the text. However I can not support it until the inline citation is up to stuff. Tirronan 02:42, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
Hey there, Black Stripe. I'd normally love to help you out, but I'm in a bit of a crunch for time at the moment, so I'll keep it brief. The sections in WP:Footnotes regarding how to use footnotes has gotten pretty useful in the last few months with a few visual demonstrations. Once you get the hang of it, it's pretty easy. You essentially just do this:
Hi Black Stripe! I've looked at this but there is still no inline citation which is about all that it lacks. Look at WP:Cite and WP:Footnotes for help on this. Once you do that I will support it. This is a pretty article. Tirronan 17:39, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
==My section==
I am very, very awesome.<ref>Doe, John. (2006). ''JHMM13'', New York: Awesome Book Publisher. ISBN 1-234-56789-0.</ref>
==References==
<references/>
And it will end up looking like this:
My section
[edit]I am very, very awesome.[1]
References
[edit]- ^ Doe, John. (2006). JHMM13, New York: Awesome Book Publisher. ISBN 1-234-56789-0 Parameter error in {{ISBN}}: checksum.
Please excuse me if I've added far too much to your talk page :-D. If you want to see how I do it myself, here's an article I'm currently attempting to bring to FA status: Domenico Selvo. Cheers, JHMM13 06:10, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
Inline citations
[edit]The article still has no inline citations. This is something that is going to take a while to do and will be a non-starter for an FAC. Once you've got all that checked out and enough citations to match the claims made in the article (check out recently-nominated FAs fo an idea of the density that is generally sought), let me know and I'll check out the prose. JHMM13 17:53, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
I've rechecked your article and you now have inline citations. You may want to add a few more but I will support it. Tirronan 16:46, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
Bongo (antelope) Vandalism
[edit]Thanks for your message. I just happened to be scanning the Recent Changes page and saw what appeared to be vandalism, so I reverted the edits. It looks like you have done a lot to improve this article so keep up the good work! DAJF 00:54, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
Textile arts
[edit]Hello. I notice you've been making some nice edits to textile arts articles. Perhaps you'd be interested in joining WikiProject Textile Arts? --Eyrian 15:59, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
G'day. I note that much of what you put into the microwave oven section is a copy of a document that has been floating around the internet for years. This document was debunked several years ago. You may wish to read: Microwaves, Nazis, cults... Gillyweed (talk) 21:29, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
Coeliac disease and passover
[edit]You have changed coeliac disease to read that one must consult a rabbi in particular circumstances. Obviously this is correct, but an encyclopedia simply cannot instruct its readers to go talk to a rabbi - encyclopedias never instruct their readers to do anything (see WP:IINFO). I am not up-to-date with recent responsa about coeliac disease. Therefore, if you could produce a recent summary of halachic views on coeliacs eating matzo on Pesach that would be much better. JFW | T@lk 06:01, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks for your message. It would be very good if you could find a published version of the opinion of Dayan Westheim shlita, because it is highly representative of the conundrum. I think the present version simply does not discuss the possibility of "I am coeliac and have no oat matzo, am I obliged to eat wheat matzo on Seder night?" JFW | T@lk 10:28, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
Help with WW2 image rights
[edit]While I have no reason to doubt what the Auschwitz museum says in regards to the images of the plan of the crematoria and the catchment map, since your photos are derivative works that the museum is apparently responsible for, here's an explanation. The image of the crematorium 2 ovens is part of the Bauleitung (construction department) album, thus it was taken 1942/1943 when the large crematoria were being built. German World War Two photographs originally had a copyright of 25 years, so its copyright expired in 1967/1968. The problem is that European copyright was harmonised, with the law coming into effect in Germany in 1995. This means that the image is copyrighted in both Germany and since in accordance with the January 1, 1996 date, even in the United States too.
Wow that was an essay, sorry, and apologies further if it doesn't make sense (I've basically paraphrased this for you). This message in a nutshell: German WW2 photographs, such as those in the Bauleitung album, are copyrighted. None of them are public domain, no matter what the Auschwitz authorities/USHMM/Yad Vashem say. Hope this helps. Regards, WilliamH (talk) 19:27, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for uploading images/media to Wikipedia! There is, however, another Wikimedia Foundation project called Wikimedia Commons, a central media repository for all free media. In the future, please consider creating an account and uploading your media there instead. That way, all of the other language Wikipedias can use them too, as well as our many sister projects. This will also allow our visitors to search for, view and use our media in one central location. If you wish to move previous uploads to Commons, see Wikipedia:Moving images to the Commons (you may view images you have previously uploaded by going to your user contributions on the left and choosing the 'image' namespace from the drop down box). Please note that non-free content, such as images claimed as fair use, cannot be uploaded to the Wikimedia Commons. Help us spread the word about Commons by informing other users, and please continue uploading! Ijanderson977 (talk) 09:33, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
Hey, thanks for the note, and great work with the article! Of course, it will need references eventually. But most of the material looks solid and uncontroversial, so there ought to be plenty of time to find sources. --Allen (talk) 04:28, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
Welcome
[edit]Welcome to the WikiProject Guitarists. Anger22 (Talk 2 22) 21:49, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
Permission to Use a Photo
[edit]Hi Black Stripe, I would like to use the image of the restored carding machine at quarry Bank Mill which you have uploaded to wikipedia in an educational textile text book and am requesting permission to do so - although the licence has said the image can be used my publisher is insisting that I have specific written permission from the owner of photographic works. I look forward to hearing from you soon. Regards Bev Ashford — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bev's Book (talk • contribs) 15:38, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
Source for quote
[edit]Hi, I was looking at this edit of yours and I noticed that the idea you mention does not seem to be in Midrash Rabbah. Could you explain where you got the idea from, in order to track down the exact citation? Thanks! Ar2332 (talk) 20:57, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:17, 19 November 2024 (UTC)