User talk:Bkonrad/Archive 116
This is an archive of past discussions about User:Bkonrad. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 110 | ← | Archive 114 | Archive 115 | Archive 116 | Archive 117 | Archive 118 | Archive 119 |
Speedy deletion nomination of Queen Camilla of the United Kigdom
A tag has been placed on Queen Camilla of the United Kigdom requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Estar8806 (talk) 12:51, 6 May 2023 (UTC)
Camilla page/talk page botched moves
Hi, apologies for the nudge but it looks like there are still problems from this mangled move. The edit history for the talk page is still at the mispelled Talk:Queen Camilla of the United Kigdom, whose main page redirects to Queen Camilla of the United Kingdom. The article should still be at Camilla, Queen Consort as a move request (to simply Queen Camilla) is in progress. Hopefully you can help fix the mess? U-Mos (talk) 12:54, 6 May 2023 (UTC)
- Talk:Queen Camilla of the United Kigdom was a cut-and-paste move. It will take some work to see whether there have been any separate edits to that copy. older ≠ wiser 12:58, 6 May 2023 (UTC)
- There was a (possibly second) copy and paste attempting to amend the spelling error, with the duplication now kept, so the edit history has been lost. But the history of the main page is intact, so no big deal I guess. U-Mos (talk) 13:05, 6 May 2023 (UTC)
The Signpost: 8 May 2023
- News and notes: New legal "deVLOPments" in the EU
- In the media: Vivek's smelly socks, online safety, and politics
- Recent research: Gender, race and notability in deletion discussions
- Featured content: I wrote a poem for each article, I found rhymes for all the lists; My first featured picture of this year now finally exists!
- Arbitration report: "World War II and the history of Jews in Poland" approaches conclusion
- News from the WMF: Planning together with the Wikimedia Foundation
Adder question
Good afternoon Bkonrad. You have reverted my rearrangement of the adder meanings, noting "no primary topic". I am unsure what this means. Can you please briefly explain it on the adder Talk page after my existing comment? Furthermore, I would appreciate yuor suggestion how to highlight the entry for medical emergencies/first aid for those bitten by adders. Thank you. 86.133.224.70 (talk) 13:00, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
The Hamster
Can you stop reverting my edits, i didn't edit anything else i was just adding stuff, you don't know how much time it took me to research this stuff. All you were doing is undoing my stuff. Please just stop. Ginger.man63 (talk) 16:52, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
- Stop adding nonsense (however well-researched you might think it) to the article. older ≠ wiser 16:53, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
Precious anniversary
Eight years! |
---|
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:37, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
Blood on the Floor – Painting, 1986
Hi can you reverse this page move back to its actual title. Neither "painting" nor "1986" were disambs; that's what the painting is usually titled as (although I do get why it might seem confusing from a wiki POV[1]. Thanks and best. Ceoil (talk) 22:09, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
- Sorry, but the Bacon estate website (among others) do not title it like that. [User:Bkonrad|older]] ≠ wiser 22:50, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
- [2], they have a different and frankly wrong formulation, but not withstanding, the painting's origional title is "blood...painting...1986[3]. He often used such titles....Painting 1946, Study of Red Pope 1962. 2nd version 1971, Triptych–August 1972, etc etc, not sure what your point is in arguing this. Ceoil (talk) 02:03, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
- Looks to me like these are descriptive, not part of the title. The sources in your links use a variety of formulations
- Blood on the Floor – Painting, 1986
- Blood on the Floor (FB; painting)
- Blood on the Floor , Painting 1986
- Blood on the Floor (1986)
- Blood on the floor - Painting ( 1986 )
- Blood on the Floor - Painting, 1986
- Blood on the Floor of 1986
- I don't see any evidence in this these sources to support claim that " – Painting, 1986" is part of the title. older ≠ wiser 02:30, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
- You seem to be right about the year, and as the article title already has the word "painting", going to drop this. Ceoil (talk) 22:30, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
- Looks to me like these are descriptive, not part of the title. The sources in your links use a variety of formulations
- [2], they have a different and frankly wrong formulation, but not withstanding, the painting's origional title is "blood...painting...1986[3]. He often used such titles....Painting 1946, Study of Red Pope 1962. 2nd version 1971, Triptych–August 1972, etc etc, not sure what your point is in arguing this. Ceoil (talk) 02:03, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
The Signpost: 22 May 2023
- In the media: History, propaganda and censorship
- Arbitration report: Final decision in "World War II and the history of Jews in Poland"
- Featured content: A very musical week for featured articles
- Traffic report: Coronation, chatbot, celebs
Speedy deletion nomination of Yuri Antonov (disambiguation)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Yuri Antonov (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either
- disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
- disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
- is an orphaned redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. NmWTfs85lXusaybq (talk) 13:44, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
The Signpost: 5 June 2023
- News and notes: WMRU director forks new 'pedia, birds flap in top '22 piccy, WMF weighs in on Indian gov's map axe plea
- Featured content: Poetry under pressure
- Traffic report: Celebs, controversies and a chatbot in the public eye
The Signpost: 19 June 2023
- News and notes: WMF Terms of Use now in force, new Creative Commons licensing
- Featured content: Content, featured
- Recent research: Hoaxers prefer currently-popular topics
REVEXP
Please follow WP:REVEXP. You didn't with Special:Diff/1161425884.
Just because you are an experienced long term editor, doesn't mean you can go reverting edits by IPs or other users. Be more careful in the future, thank you. 90.254.6.237 (talk) 16:57, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you for reverting you own edit though, as you realized that the DAB page had no reason for existence. 90.254.6.237 (talk) 17:03, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
Probably due for a dab page, eh? - UtherSRG (talk) 12:13, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
- Perhaps so. older ≠ wiser 12:58, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
Monomyms
Hi, with regards to your recent edits. Don't mononyms go on the disambiguation page? Gotitbro (talk) 13:36, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
- Yes, although I saw nothing in the articles supporting claim that the actresses were commonly known by the mononym and thus no reason for a redirect to one particular actress with a given name over other actresses with the same name. older ≠ wiser 14:05, 27 June 2023 (UTC)