User talk:Bjornkarl

Regarding AniTa Terminal article notability

AniTa will be inserted into the List of Terminal Emulators
AniTa will be inserted into the Comparison of Terminal Emulators

I have been asked by one of your advisors to first create the AniTa article in order to reference it from the above articles. As far as I can see, there are already a number of references in the above 2 listings that are accepted in the Wikipedia as standalone articles. Most of those articles are informative in the same level and with less external references as the submitted AniTa article. I have read the notability guidelines, but I can't see what makes for example the PenguiNet article more in line with the guidelines than the AniTa article. Am I missing something here. Please advice in what way I can improve. Bjornkarl (talk) 14:13, 10 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Done The article has already been accepted by User:Rcsprinter123 and has no problen now. Zhaofeng Li [talk... contribs...] 04:16, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

AniTa (Windows application), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Rcsprinter (talkin' to me?) @ 20:40, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of AniTa (Windows application)

The article AniTa (Windows application) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

no assertion of notability, author's WP:OTHERSTUFF is not a strong argument

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Widefox; talk 10:07, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Tagged AniTa (Windows application) with {{COI}}

I've tagged the article because you seem to have a close connction with the application described on the page. Please read more about the policy on Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. Find the page confusing? Try Wikipedia:Plain and simple conflict of interest guide Zhaofeng Li [talk... contribs...] 04:32, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Source of facts for AniTa (Windows application)

Using Wiki pages as a daily source for information, I understand and appreciate your concern. Conflict of interest must be a common problem in Wiki pages. In this case, I admit I have a long relation to the AniTa technology and I know most of the facts about AniTa. Me being the author of the article is what it is and can't easily be changed, and if this is in hard conflict with the Wiki rules, then I will have to ask you if you think there is some other way to modify the article to get it accepted. I have really tried to make it unbiased and stay away from all text that could be viewed as promotion or advertisement. Would it help if some other people edit the article? In order to remove possible smell of advertisement, I am now in the process of removing the list of features as it may have looked like ads.
And, I don't want to remove any Wiki editors "proposal for deletion" tag, however I would appreciate if the article is not removed within such a short time period.