User talk:Bizjournals
|
Your edits to Accenture (a.o.)
[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, the external links you added to the page Accenture do not comply with our guidelines for external links. Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.
If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Accenture, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
- editing articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with,
- participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors,
- linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam);
- and you must always:
- avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially neutral point of view, verifiability, and autobiography.
For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see Wikipedia:Business' FAQ. For more details about what constitutes a conflict of interest, please see Wikipedia:Conflict of Interest. Thank you. --Dirk Beetstra T C 15:24, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
COI
[edit]I noted in this comment you left that you are an employee of an "online business news media company". Yet you seem to be creating multiple articles for various business journals that all appear to be from the same company. If this is the company you work for, then This is a blatant violation of the wikipedia Conflict of interest policy. I know Beetstra asked you to read that policy already, so I suggest you go back and reread it a bit more thoroughly. In addition I strongly suggest you read Wikipedia:Spam, in particular the How not to be a spammer section. Improbcat 18:30, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
-I apologize for that and will re-read and not making any further changes.
{{helpme}}
I have a question; there are several links on the American City Business Journals page that point to several of our business journals (which were pre-existing before I made any contributions). The information found on these pages (example "Columbus Business First") simply gives a quick snippet of information about the publication and the origin of this publication. If I'm providing the same factual information about our other papers presented in an identical fashion, then how come the Columbus Business First can remain yet if I contribute, I get penalized? Is it simply because I am an employee? How can I have our information about our 41 business journals placed in Wikipedia without getting penalized every time I try to do this? (FYI; our 41 print journals plus 1 strictly online journal totaling 42 are parented under our top domain; bizjournals. In other words, each of our local business journals is going to have a root domain of "bizjournals.com" within the URL.) Not sure if that was also leading to the deletions or not.
- Well for starters, since wikipedia is created through voluntary efforts, the other articles were probably simply not noticed or dealt with before this. Since you pointed them out I have put them up for Articles for Deletion so people can add their input on if they should be deleted or not. Please note that inclusion of one article does not affect inclusion of another.
- One of the big problems is, as I said above, that anything you contribute on these subjects is going to suffer from a massive case of Conflict of interest. Also the How not to be a spammer bit specifically says:
- "Don't make a new article for your own product or Web site. Most often, when a person creates a new article describing his or her own work, it's because the work is not yet well-known enough to have attracted anyone else's attention, much less verifiable sources. Articles of this sort are usually deleted. Wikipedia does indeed have articles about popular products and Web sites, but it is not acceptable to use Wikipedia to popularize them."
- Thus you would be better served to wait and let the articles for the various journals be created or not as they become notable. If you have encyclopedic information to add to the articles (founding dates, editors, notable events/figures/etc.), then by all means go ahead and add that information. We aren't trying to tell you not to edit wikipedia and not to contribute. It is more a matter of trying to make sure that your edits are not done for the purpose of promoting your own company/products and are in line with wikipedia's policies and practices. Improbcat 19:32, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
Deletion tags
[edit]Do not remove deletion tags from articles you have created, as you did with The Business Review. If you wish to contest the tag, the means to do so are noted in the deletion tag. Removal of tags without cause is considered vandalism, and doing so may result in your being blocked from editing wikipedia.
In addition, do no remove the Conflict of Interest tags unless you can prove that you do no have a conflict of interest with regards to the article. Improbcat 18:43, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
Spam in New Mexico Business Weekly
[edit]
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on New Mexico Business Weekly, by Improbcat (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because New Mexico Business Weekly is blatant advertising for a company, product, group, service or person that would require a substantial rewrite in order to become an encyclopedia article.
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting New Mexico Business Weekly, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 18:44, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
Spam in Atlanta Business Chronicle
[edit]Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Atlanta Business Chronicle, by Improbcat (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Atlanta Business Chronicle is blatant advertising for a company, product, group, service or person that would require a substantial rewrite in order to become an encyclopedia article.
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Atlanta Business Chronicle, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 18:44, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
Spam in Birmingham Business Journal
[edit]Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Birmingham Business Journal, by Improbcat (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Birmingham Business Journal is blatant advertising for a company, product, group, service or person that would require a substantial rewrite in order to become an encyclopedia article.
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Birmingham Business Journal, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 18:45, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
Spam in Boston Business Journal
[edit]Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Boston Business Journal, by Improbcat (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Boston Business Journal is blatant advertising for a company, product, group, service or person that would require a substantial rewrite in order to become an encyclopedia article.
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Boston Business Journal, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 18:45, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
Spam in Buffalo Business First
[edit]Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Buffalo Business First, by Improbcat (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Buffalo Business First is blatant advertising for a company, product, group, service or person that would require a substantial rewrite in order to become an encyclopedia article.
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Buffalo Business First, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 18:45, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
Spam in Charlotte Business Journal
[edit]Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Charlotte Business Journal, by Improbcat (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Charlotte Business Journal is blatant advertising for a company, product, group, service or person that would require a substantial rewrite in order to become an encyclopedia article.
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Charlotte Business Journal, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 18:46, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
Spam in Business Courier
[edit]Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Business Courier, by Improbcat (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Business Courier is blatant advertising for a company, product, group, service or person that would require a substantial rewrite in order to become an encyclopedia article.
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Business Courier, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 18:46, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
July
[edit] Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as the articles mentioned above, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.
Pleas see WP:COI. DGG (talk) 18:53, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
Spam in Austin Business Journal
[edit]Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Austin Business Journal, by Improbcat (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Austin Business Journal is blatant advertising for a company, product, group, service or person that would require a substantial rewrite in order to become an encyclopedia article.
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Austin Business Journal, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 18:59, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
Spam in Baltimore Business Journal
[edit]Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Baltimore Business Journal, by Nuttah68 (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Baltimore Business Journal is blatant advertising for a company, product, group, service or person that would require a substantial rewrite in order to become an encyclopedia article.
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Baltimore Business Journal, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 19:14, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
This is your last warning.
The next time you insert a spam link, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted as well, preventing anyone from linking to them from any site that uses the MediaWiki spam blacklist, which includes all of Wikimedia and Wikipedia.
Enough is enough; you've been warned. --Eyrian 18:01, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
Blocked
[edit]- This is often not a reflection on the user, and you are encouraged to choose a new account name which does meet our guidelines and are invited to contribute to Wikipedia under an appropriate username. If you feel this block was made in error, you may quickly and easily appeal it—see below.
Our username policy provides guidance on selecting your username. In brief, usernames should not be offensive, disruptive, promotional, misleading, or related to a 'real-world' group or organization. Also, usernames may not end with the string "bot" unless the account is an approved bot account.
If you have already made edits and wish to keep your existing contributions under a new name you may request a change in username. To do so, please follow these directions:
- Add
{{unblock-un|your new username here}}below. This is possible because even when you are blocked, you can usually still edit your own talk page. - At an administrator's discretion, you may be unblocked for 24 hours to file a request.
- Please note, you may only request a name that is not already in use. The account is created upon acceptance – do not try to create the new account before making the request for a name change since we can far more easily allocate your new name to you, if it is not yet used. Usernames that have already been taken are listed here. For more information, please visit Wikipedia:Changing username.
- Alternatively, you can "abandon" the contributions under this username and create a new account, which is much faster and easier, especially if you have few or no edits.
- Add
{{unblock|Your reason here}} below or emailing the administrator who blocked you.