User talk:Bitspectator
Welcome to Wikipedia!
[edit]
Welcome Bitspectator!I'm Red-tailed hawk, one of the other editors here, and I hope you decide to stay and help contribute to this amazing repository of knowledge.
| Some pages of helpful information to get you started: | Some common sense Dos and Don'ts:
|
| If you need further help, you can: | or you can: | or even: |
Alternatively, leave me a message at my talk page or type {{Help me}} here on your talk page and someone will try to help.
There are many ways you can contribute to Wikipedia. Here are a few ideas:
|
|
To get some practice editing you can use a sandbox. You can create your own personal sandbox for use any time. It's perfect for working on bigger projects. Then for easy access in the future, you can put {{My sandbox}} on your user page. By the way, seeing as you haven't created a user page yet, simply click here to start it.
Please remember to:
- Always sign your posts on talk pages. You can do this either by clicking on the
button on the edit toolbar or by typing four tildes ~~~~at the end of your post. This will automatically insert your signature, a link to your talk page, and a timestamp. - Leave descriptive edit summaries for your edits. Doing so helps other editors understand what changes you have made and why you made them.
Introduction to contentious topics
[edit]
You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
- adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
- comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
- follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
- comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
- refrain from gaming the system.
Additionally, you must be logged-in, have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days, and are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on a page within this topic.
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.
Welcome!
[edit]Hi Bitspectator! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
The rule that affects you most as a new or IP editor is the prohibition on making any edit related to the Arab–Israel conflict unless you are logged into an account and that account is at least 30 days old and has made at least 500 edits.
This prohibition is broadly construed, so it includes edits such as adding the reaction of a public figure concerning the conflict to their article or noting the position of a company or organization as it relates to the conflict.
The exception to this rule is that you may request a specific change to an article on the talk page of that article or at this page. Please ensure that your requested edit complies with our neutral point of view and reliable sourcing policies, and if the edit is about a living person our policies on biographies of living people as well.
Any edits you make contrary to these rules are likely to be reverted, and repeated violations can lead to you being blocked from editing.As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Happy editing! Selfstudier (talk) 09:08, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
- Hello Selfstudier. I created my account to nitpick those articles related to the Gaza war. Now that I am learning the joys of Wikipedia, I hope to expand my editing to other topics which interest me. I appreciate you being patient while I learn the ropes. Bitspectator (talk) 10:56, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
- Per the above notices and WP:ARBECR, this edit has been reverted, only edit requests are permitted in the topic area. Thank you. Selfstudier (talk) 11:02, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
- I'm confused then. Why is that noticeboard WP:ARBECR? What edit request could I make for that noticeboard beyond agreeing with whether a source is reliable? Bitspectator (talk) 11:10, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
- You are not permitted to do anything related to the topic area, broadly construed, except make straightforward edit requests at article talk pages. You may comment at RSN about things that are not CTs. Selfstudier (talk) 11:20, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
- Got it, thanks. Bitspectator (talk) 11:24, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
- You are not permitted to do anything related to the topic area, broadly construed, except make straightforward edit requests at article talk pages. You may comment at RSN about things that are not CTs. Selfstudier (talk) 11:20, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
- I'm confused then. Why is that noticeboard WP:ARBECR? What edit request could I make for that noticeboard beyond agreeing with whether a source is reliable? Bitspectator (talk) 11:10, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
- Per the above notices and WP:ARBECR, this edit has been reverted, only edit requests are permitted in the topic area. Thank you. Selfstudier (talk) 11:02, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
ITN recognition for 2024 invasion of Lebanon
[edit]
On 2 October 2024, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article 2024 invasion of Lebanon, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Schwede66 01:47, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
ITN recognition for Yahya Sinwar
[edit]On 17 October 2024, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Yahya Sinwar, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Schwede66 23:59, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
Question
[edit]Sorry you feel frustrated here. Which question of yours did I ignore? VR (Please ping on reply) 13:42, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
- The end of my previous comment [1] had a new line, with the question:
Now, what exactly in my original comment did you disagree with?
- This was after you asked me the following questions:
@Bitspectator can you explain the difference between opposing Israel's existence and being anti-Zionist? [2]
@Bitspectator, can you explain the difference between "Calls for the destruction of Israel" and "opposing Israel's existence"? [3]
@Bitspectator can you explain whether these following statements are "calling for the destruction of Israel" or are "anti-zionist" or both? [4]
- I gave each of these a straightforward response. You can respond to my question in the thread I asked it. Bitspectator ⛩️ 15:31, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
Re Talk:November 2024 Amsterdam attacks
[edit]Regarding your response to my edit request: in that case, it would be better to use Zuhri's statement itself, set in quotation marks ("the ongoing genocide in Gaza ..."). Checking the source, it's clear that Zuhri's statement is used verbatim (from that point onward) anyway, so this is as much a matter of attribution as it is of avoiding reflexive weasel word semioses.
I'm responding here only because I've missed the contentious topics template on two separate talk pages today, and don't want anyone to misconstrue my edits as an attempt at commentary (hence disruptive).
--ΝΗΜΙΝΥΛΙ 02:30, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Hi. I see nothing disruptive about your request. I opened it up, you can leave your follow up there. Bitspectator ⛩️ 02:50, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:55, 19 November 2024 (UTC)