User talk:BitcoinrealityCheck

Welcome!

Hello, BitcoinrealityCheck, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! --John (talk) 19:16, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

March 2014

Please don't add your original research on Wikipedia. In future, please show the source for any information you add, so that it is verifiable for users. --John (talk) 19:16, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disruptive editing

You're not only adding original research you're removing verifiable and cited statements that have been already discussed and vetted ad nauseam. Please just post on Talk:Bitcoin the things that you have problems with and we'll work together to make the article better. I consider your current actions to be disruptive editing. Chris Arnesen 20:39, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It is verifiable in the international press - I can quote if you like - that the US defined bitcoin as a property not a currency. You cannot possible have a problem with that. BitcoinrealityCheck (talk) 20:42, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Do you call what the US decides "disruptive" ?? BitcoinrealityCheck (talk) 20:42, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I left a quote on the Bitcoin article that the US IRS regards bitcoin as a property and not a currency

I left a quote on Bitcoin to prove that the US IRS regard~s it as a property and not a currency. Surely you do not have a problem with this? BitcoinrealityCheck (talk) 21:03, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not necessarily. Is it verifiable? --John (talk) 21:07, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yes it is verifiable: Check the reference, namely Business Insider, I left on the Bitcoin article. Here is another reference for you: ^[1]. It is very strange that you have problems with verifiable references: just google:"US IRS regards Bitcoin as property and not a currency" and you will get thousands of references. BitcoinrealityCheck (talk) 21:13, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

There is no problem with your addition now that you have added a reference. I have moved it out of the lead paragraph to where it belongs in the article. Thanks for your addition. --John (talk) 21:15, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The US economy is the biggest economy in the world. Do you disagree? It belongs in the lead paragraph.You are very disruptive. BitcoinrealityCheck (talk) 21:18, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

"Disruptive" has a very specific meaning on Wikipedia and it is a behavior that can result in a block. I advise yourself to get familiar with what it means by reading Wikipedia:Disruptive editing so that you can avoid being disruptive. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:51, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

BitcoinrealityCheck, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi BitcoinrealityCheck! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Writ Keeper (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:07, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

^ [1]

[1] [1]

[1]