User talk:bitbit

If I have left you a message: please answer on your talk page, as I am watching it.
If you leave me a message: I will answer on my talk page, then place {{Talkback|Bitbit}} on your talk.
Please click here to leave me a new message.

Fair use

Please note that I am not interested in receiving notifications about fair-use images that I uploaded. If you want a wordy rationale, it's really your responsibility to add one, not mine.

Civility

Nez, this edit was not WP:Civil. RomaC (talk) 16:10, 16 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Aye, and you can say the same about Falastine fee Qalby's edit. and in fact that whole discussion that was out of place as per Wikipedia:TALK. I have however corrected my edit since, into a more "Civil" response. --Nezek (talk) 16:19, 16 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

March 2009

Huh? What made you think this was a test? that line was very unclear. And I'm certainly not a new user (: --Nezek (talk) 07:49, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

oh, sorry, I've just never seen anyone use a "huh" template before, guess that makes me the new user ^^, but anyway apologies Spitfire^Tally-ho! 07:54, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

np. --Nezek (talk) 07:55, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

False and unreliable?

^{[citation needed]}? ViperSnake151 20:55, 13 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Are you asking for where it says so on the talk page? See Talk:TV Links#Shutdown section, and I know you've already seen the detailed discussion about the lead, because you took my suggestion and changed the article when we were still discussing it, so why are you changing it again now without disputing it on the talk page first? --bitbit (pka Nezek) ^(talk) 22:26, 13 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Uhh I used a different source for the Netherlands claim. ViperSnake151 22:41, 13 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I read it now and re-added the netherlands claim, but the other bit about the copyright issues has no sources... and you moved the part that said "most notable for" to the second paragraph... I commented about it all on the talk page, and no one has answered/objected yet. --bitbit (pka Nezek) ^(talk) 22:45, 13 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

July 2009

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Bluetooth. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Imroy (talk) 21:04, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vegan document.pdf listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Vegan document.pdf, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 13:54, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:17, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]