User talk:Bitafarhadi

Welcome!

Hello, Bitafarhadi, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! --IamtheWelcomeMan (talk) 23:14, 17 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

April 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Anshan (Persia) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

'''), southwest of [[Khuzestan]], in the '''[[Beyza]] / [[Ramjerd]]''' plain, in the province of [[ Province|[Khuzestan]] '''' in the [[Zagros mountains]], southwestern [[Iran]], was one of the

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 08:22, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Anshan (Izeh.)

Hi, I'm TheMagikCow. Bitafarhadi, thanks for creating Anshan (Izeh.)

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please delete the persian. Also please provide sources.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. TheMagikCow (talk) 18:03, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

August 2014

Please stop adding unsourced content. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. You must stop adding unsourced and disputed information. Dougweller (talk) 09:03, 13 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Xerxes I may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Xerxes خشایار شاه ا was born in Sūsa ( modern) Shūsh شوش) County,.South West of Khuzestan Province Persia, Xerxes,had Bakhtiari بختیاری descent, Immediately

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 09:16, 13 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Bitafarhadi, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your addition to Anshan (Persia) has had to be removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material without permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and a cited source. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. However, there are steps that must be taken to verify that license before you do. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied without attribution. If you want to copy from another Wikipedia project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Dougweller (talk) 09:56, 13 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

August 2014

Your recent editing history at Xerxes I shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Dougweller (talk) 10:11, 13 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits and lack of communication are leading to a block

Wikipedia is a collaborative project - it is essential that editors work together and discuss when there are problems. You are clearly not doing that and are refusing to add sources. You must start talking and stop edit-warring or there really is no alternative to blocking you. Dougweller (talk) 10:18, 13 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

August 2014

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Dougweller (talk) 11:06, 13 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Adding the same copyright material, not responding to my request for discussion above or engaging in discussions, repeated addition of unsourced material, etc. Dougweller (talk) 11:07, 13 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note I have also blocked your three undisclosed alternative accounts Piroz12, R tehrani and Sarafarzad. (@Dougweller: pinging you as an FYI). --Jezebel'sPonyo ^{bons mots} 20:22, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]