User talk:Biscuittin/Archive7

Disambiguation link notification for January 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Holy Monastery of Venerable Father David, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Catholicon (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 11 January 2014 (UTC)

Dadong Subdistrict, Guangzhou

Hi, your edit comment on Dadong Subdistrict, Guangzhou asked why Category:Subdistricts of the People's Republic of China was deleted - it was because there are probably a few hundred thousand subdistricts in China, which is too big for a single category. Instead - "Category:township-level divisions of XXX (where XXX is the relevant province) is used. Best, ► Philg88 ◄ ^talk 12:05, 10 March 2014 (UTC)

Thank you. Biscuittin (talk) 17:47, 10 March 2014 (UTC)

Another FYI, in general only the first geographic specifier in a location is usually linked per WP:LINK, WP:LEADLINK and WP:SEAOFBLUE, e.g. "Guangdong Province" and "China" (in particular) don't need to be linked; the idea being that a reader gets the general idea of where somewhere is and if they want more detail they can "drill through" to subsequent articles from the first link (e.g. [[Linked location]]-->Guangdong-->China). ► Philg88 ◄ ^talk 04:23, 11 March 2014 (UTC)

(p.s. I'm not stalking you, it's just that I created or fixed up a lot of the Chinese geography stubs you are editing and they appear on my watchlist.)

OK, noted. Biscuittin (talk) 07:51, 11 March 2014 (UTC)

Stephen Trimble listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Stephen Trimble. Since you had some involvement with the Stephen Trimble redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. MilborneOne (talk) 18:43, 14 March 2014 (UTC)

Reference Errors on 18 March

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Christian Action Research and Education page, your edit caused an unnamed parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:28, 19 March 2014 (UTC)

Copyvio? (Raba)

Why did you add copyvio tag to Rába (company)? Nobody has cared about it since 2009, see Raba (automobile) revision history (I have moved the text from there recently). Fakirbakir (talk) 10:21, 9 April 2014 (UTC)

Oh, I see the problem.....Sorry.Fakirbakir (talk) 10:27, 9 April 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Twifo-Heman, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Akan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 13 April 2014 (UTC)

Fixed. Biscuittin (talk) 14:24, 25 April 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Lightweight design

I'm not going to template a regular, but I thought you should know that I have proposed the article Lightweight design for deletion. You are the only person, apart from the article creator, who has done something to the article that wasn't adding or removing tags or vandalism.

Feel free to delete the {{Proposed deletion/dated}} tag if you think this deserves wider discussion.

Yaris678 (talk) 09:55, 12 May 2014 (UTC)

Thank you. I do not object to deletion. Biscuittin (talk) 15:48, 12 May 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Canadian Metro Airlines for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Canadian Metro Airlines is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Canadian Metro Airlines (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Safiel (talk) 16:37, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

I do not object to deletion. Biscuittin (talk) 18:17, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

n

	n
	hey Camaro fan 1 (talk) 16:48, 21 May 2014 (UTC)

Ah, the Holy Grail. Biscuittin (talk) 18:30, 21 May 2014 (UTC)

hey

	hey
	hey Camaro fan 1 (talk) 16:59, 22 May 2014 (UTC)

Are you trying to tell me something? Biscuittin (talk) 18:46, 22 May 2014 (UTC)

June 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Lok Baintan Floating Market may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:04, 24 June 2014 (UTC)

Fixed. Biscuittin (talk) 19:22, 24 June 2014 (UTC)

Renaming of Proposed rail infrastructure in the United Kingdom subcategories

Please see my proposal to rename Category:Proposed rail transport in England, Category:Proposed rail transport in Scotland, Category:Proposed rail transport in Wales, Category:Proposed rail transport in Northern Ireland, Category:Rail Infrastructure projects in the United Kingdom Category:Transport projects in London & Category:Proposed transport projects in London; all subcategories of Category:Proposed rail infrastructure in the United Kingdom, also Category:Proposed railways in the United Kingdom. Hugo999 (talk) 14:44, 30 June 2014 (UTC)

Category:Scania trucks

Category:Scania trucks, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 11:10, 15 August 2014 (UTC)

September 2014

Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. I am glad to see that you are discussing a topic. However, as a general rule, talk pages such as Talk:Router (computing) are for discussion related to improving the article, not general discussion about the topic or unrelated topics. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. Thank you. Elizium23 (talk) 03:28, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Barnstar of Diligence
	The Barnstar of Diligence is hereby awarded in recognition of a combination of extraordinary scrutiny, precision and community service. PhilKnight (talk) 01:57, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

Thank you. Biscuittin (talk) 20:34, 14 November 2014 (UTC)

Patriotic Socialist Party

I have nominated Patriotic Socialist Party for deletion. The party barely meets any Wikipedia guidelines on notability or importance. Please feel free to have your say on this deletion. doktorb _words^deeds 18:39, 21 November 2014 (UTC)

Repost of Patriotic Socialist Party

A tag has been placed on Patriotic Socialist Party requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, because it appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion process. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's discussion directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please contact the administrator who deleted the page or use deletion review instead of recreating the page. Thank you. JASpencer (talk) 10:26, 22 November 2014 (UTC)

The article has been deleted. doktorb _words^deeds 23:14, 22 November 2014 (UTC)