User talk:BirdZilla

Important Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Doug Weller talk 17:05, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Edit-warring at Ben Garrison

Your edit-warring against talk-page consensus is prohibited by policy. Should you revert again, I will file an Arbitration Enforcement request that you be permanently topic-banned from Ben Garrison, broadly construed. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 23:44, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have no clear consensus and pretending otherwise isn't fooling anyone. I expect you'll run to arbitration, but I hope that'll note your attempts at effectively owning the article. BirdZilla (talk) 23:52, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Arbitration enforcement

There is a discussion regarding your conduct at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement#BirdZilla. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 00:04, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notice that you are now subject to an arbitration enforcement sanction

The following sanction now applies to you:

You are indefinitely topic banned from all pages related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, broadly construed.

You have been sanctioned for the reasons provided in response to this arbitration enforcement request.

This sanction is imposed in my capacity as an uninvolved administrator under the authority of the Arbitration Committee's decision at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/American politics 2#Final decision and, if applicable, the procedure described at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions. This sanction has been recorded in the log of sanctions. If the sanction includes a ban, please read the banning policy to ensure you understand what this means. If you do not comply with this sanction, you may be blocked for an extended period, by way of enforcement of this sanction—and you may also be made subject to further sanctions.

You may appeal this sanction using the process described here. I recommend that you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template if you wish to submit an appeal to the arbitration enforcement noticeboard. You may also appeal directly to me (on my talk page), before or instead of appealing to the noticeboard. Even if you appeal this sanction, you remain bound by it until you are notified by an uninvolved administrator that the appeal has been successful. You are also free to contact me on my talk page if anything of the above is unclear to you. — Newslinger talk 06:19, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

What an absolute joke, this site really has gone to shit. BirdZilla (talk) 14:38, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]