User talk:Biobelle5

Welcome!

Hello, Biobelle5, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Ian and I work with the Wiki Education Foundation; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.

I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.

Handouts
Choosing an article to edit Editing an article • Add images to articles Citing sources on Wikipedia
Additional Resources
You can find answers to many student questions on our Q&A site, ask.wikiedu.org

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 18:20, 16 January 2018 (UTC)

Peer Review of Jane C. Wright Article

Hello!

Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?

--Everything seemed relevant to Wright's story and background. Nothing was distracting and I liked the picture that was included.

Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?

--The article was largely neutral but seemed a little biased towards Wright herself. It emphasized that she "literally saved millions of lives" with her discovery. Which is true. But seemed like a fairly subjective statement that shouldn't have been included at least with that particular wording.

Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?

--I would have appreciated some more about her personal background because, even though that isn't pertinent as a scientist, is important to show how much she was juggling and if she had any struggles behind the scenes of her public success.

Check the citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article?

--each citation works and seems reliable except for the 8th one that has no link and very few details

Is each fact supported by an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted?

--Each source seems neutral and appropriate.

Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that should be added?

--there is information about her early life but nothing about her later personal life, just her accomplishments

NoetherIsLikeNoOther (talk) 22:18, 10 February 2018 (UTC)