User talk:Binit14

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Binit14 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

They are continuously changing data from my article which have six references one from the Government of Uttarakhand itself. I'm new I do not know how to use wikipedia properly but they are trying to ward off their supremacy over other people's article and edits. Binit14 (talk) 17:48, 8 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This does not convince me you have read WP:EW, it does not convince me you understand that policy, and you do not show how you would behave differently in the future. WP:GAB will help you understand how to craft a reasonable unblock request. Yamla (talk) 18:03, 8 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Binit14 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I don't understand this, the three-revert rule was what being exactly violated by Fylindfotberserk but only I was not able to cite this, so all the allegations in fact were kept against me. I'm falsely accused of using multiple accounts I have only one account and the other one is of my mother who also feels the same change should be made within that particular article. This lack of transparency in the acts committed by experienced administrators has now led me to say that Wikipedias policy is unjust and unfair and this site is not for genuine editors who do not have so much knowledge about coding and all that stuff, even if they have knowledge on a particular subject and want to share it. I would like to tell you that first I made several genuine edits then my mother through her account Vinita14 made some edits to that same article which she felt should be made as they were not authentic then some independent user (whom I do not know) namely Hemant Dabral again made some genuine edits that he thought should be made (you can check the edit history of Sarola Brahmins) even after that only one person Fylindfotberserk is considering his supremacy and dominance over an article and administrators are flocking in his support and blocking other users.

Decline reason:

Please see WP:FAMILY. If your family members edit in the same exact way as you, they will be treated as if they are you. Instead of recruiting people to help you "win" a content dispute, you should use dispute resolution. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 14:45, 10 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Block evasion

This user has continued to engage in block evasion as of May, 2019. --Yamla (talk) 10:31, 15 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

And September, 2019. --Yamla (talk) 13:54, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]