User talk:Bingo1on1

Notice

Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Bingo1on1. Thank you. Insulam Simia (talk) 09:04, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for personal attacks against other users, using Wikipedia for promotion, and either sockpuppetry or meatpuppetry. If you want to edit, you must do so civilly, under only 1 account, and according to our other policies on notability and neutrality. If you're willing to agree to those, it's slightly possible someone may be wililng to unblock you; if so, make an unblock request at only one of your two accounts.. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Qwyrxian (talk) 10:04, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have dreadly understood my mistake [User:Qwyrxian] I hear by wont make any racial comment against anyone. And wont interrupt in an argument with other Authors. About sockpuppetry i have no clue about it, I use a public source of internet at my college campus. So hopefully you may consider this as a last mistake and unblock the account.

You'll need to make an unblock request like is explained above. Copy the following: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here Qwyrxian (talk) 02:57, 24 August 2013 (UTC)}}, remove the "tlx", and put your reason where it says Your reason here. However, are you stating that you are not the same person as User:Sampanchaa and User:Deedayamit? I find it highly unlikely that there are 4 distinct people who all edit from the same public internet source who are all interested in the exact same topic. I recommend that you explain this in more detail. Qwyrxian (talk) 02:57, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bingo1on1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Thankyou for your response,to begin with I really don't know who User:Sampanchaa is, I really don't have any connect with him, When it comes to User:Deejayamit he is my senior in college, he has been doing article for a while on wiki. As it was a time for our assignment i had asked User:Deejayamit his help on creating article on wikipedia. where he had guided me to what articles he had created. And i have not contributed anything to his article, i just peeped in to how the format has to be written, because he is good at writing a good source. And the other big mistake was asking some one his nationality, and being rude. So hopefully you may consider this as my last mistake. "I clearly state that i don't have any connect with User:sampanchaa, And also to bring to your notice User:sampanchaa even went on looking into User:Deejayamit article. Which later was undo by User:Deejayamit". Here is the History for it. (cur | prev) 21:51, 20 August 2013‎ Deejayamit (talk | contribs)‎ . . (8,240 bytes) (+20)‎ . . (Undid revision 569482273 by Sampanchaa (talk)) (undo) (cur | prev) 21:48, 20 August 2013‎ Sampanchaa (talk | contribs)‎ m . . (8,220 bytes) (-20)‎ . . (undo). Thankyou. Qwyrxian (talk) 02:57, 24 August 2013 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Your contributions have consisted of nonsensical, incompetent page moves and combative talk page posts. And the socking is exceedingly obvious and lame. We don't need any of that, thanks. Beeblebrox (talk) 19:37, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Note: There is quite a lot more in that request, but it's not displaying. I can't see why it's done this, but it's all there in 'edit source'. Peridon (talk) 20:19, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed. :) - Bilby (talk) 20:25, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thankyou User:Bilby

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If you have already appealed to the Unblock Ticket Request System and been declined you may appeal to the the Arbitration Committee's Ban Appeals Subcommittee. Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.