User talk:Bine Mai/Archive7

Oil rocks

Hello, could you help me to improve this article - Neft Daşları? I think there is few errors and I would appreciate your help.--NovaSkola (talk) 12:24, 26 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Bine Mai. You have new messages at Template talk:Cities in Dacia.
Message added 15:42, 27 December 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Cool template. Need to review name/scope Codrinb (talk) 15:42, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Ports

To WikiProject Ports members:

I've proposed that WP:PORTS be rebadged as a task force of Wikipedia:WikiProject Transport. I think this would increase the pool of ports editors and help us expand our article range and quality. But that's just my view - please feel free to offer yours. The discussion is here, comments or criticisms welcomed. Euryalus (talk) 12:20, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Lists of EU countries

Template:Lists of EU countries has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Mhiji (talk) 13:55, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nom for Leviathan gas field

Hi, your recent DYK submission, Leviathan gas field, has an issue that needs clarifying before it can be featured on the main page—one whole section is unreferenced. Reaper Eternal (talk) 11:30, 2 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Can you take another look? Thanks SmartSE (talk) 19:46, 2 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I probably could but what's wrong with this one? BineMai 20:07, 2 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Observatie

Numai adauga jucatori aiurea la List of foreign Liga I players, in primul rand acei jucatori trebuie sa aiba cateva meciuri ca sa fie pusi pe lista. Ai adugat cativa jucatori care n-au nicio presenta in Liga I. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.24.196.129 (talk) 12:51, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Leviathan gas field

On 5 January 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Leviathan gas field, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the Leviathan gas field – discovered in 2010 and located 130 kilometres (81 mi) west of Haifa, Israel, in the eastern Mediterranean Sea – is one of the world’s largest offshore gas finds of the past decade? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Thanks for your contribution Victuallers (talk) 03:54, 5 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sergei Lepmets

The article Sergei Lepmets has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG, and who has not played in a fully pro league. Although Liga I is fully pro he has not played for Politehnica.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 17:22, 9 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NSPORT is the main guideline governing the notability of athletes, and other sports-related people. It effectively says that footballers are notable if they have played for their country's national team or in a fully professional league. Sir Sputnik (talk) 18:08, 9 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Groningen gas field

On 9 January 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Groningen gas field, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the Groningen gas field is the largest natural gas field in Europe and the tenth largest in the world? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

The DYK project (nominate) 18:02, 9 January 2011 (UTC)

Autopatrolled

Hello, this is just to let you know that I have granted you the "autopatrolled" permission. This won't affect your editing, it just automatically marks any page you create as patrolled, benefiting new page patrollers. Please remember:

This permission does not give you any special status or authority
Submission of inappropriate material may lead to its removal
You may wish to display the {{Autopatrolled}} top icon and/or the {{User wikipedia/autopatrolled}} userbox on your user page
If, for any reason, you decide you do not want the permission, let me know and I can remove it

If you have any questions about the permission, don't hesitate to ask. Otherwise, happy editing! HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 22:10, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer permission

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged revisions, underwent a two-month trial which ended on 15 August 2010. Its continued use is still being discussed by the community, you are free to participate in such discussions. Many articles still have pending changes protection applied, however, and the ability to review pending changes continues to be of use.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under level 1 pending changes and edits made by non-reviewers to level 2 pending changes protected articles (usually high traffic articles). Pending changes was applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

For the guideline on reviewing, see Wikipedia:Reviewing. Being granted reviewer rights doesn't grant you status nor change how you can edit articles even with pending changes. The general help page on pending changes can be found here, and the general policy for the trial can be found here.

If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 22:10, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

List of ancient cities in Thrace and Dacia

Salut! Any reason to remove the bold marking from List of ancient cities in Thrace and Dacia. Is not part of the style of every article?! Just wondering! Regards!--Codrin.B (talk) 20:40, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It is part of the style but not very used in lists. BineMai 20:44, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Are you sure? What about: List of ancient Greek cities, Lists of office-holders, List of unincorporated communities in Iowa, List of rulers of Thrace and Dacia, List of rulers of Illyria. I think it looked better before though and more consistent with the other lists. Let me know what you think.--Codrin.B (talk) 20:50, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

When i submitted my List of tallest buildings in Bucharest for WP:FL a number of editors asked me to de-bold the words resembling the title located at the beginning of the sentence in the first paragraph and i thought that the style has changed but maybe this is only available for featured lists. I don't know what to say but if you think it looks better in bold change it back, i don't mind at all. Cheers BineMai 20:57, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

But if you look at List of rulers of Thrace and Dacia you can see that the bolded text looks better without the Thrace and Dacia wikilinked. Let's try this at List of ancient cities in Thrace and Dacia. What do you think? BineMai 20:59, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Good idea, let's do that.--Codrin.B (talk) 21:02, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Done. BineMai 21:06, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Cool! Thanks! ;-) --Codrin.B (talk) 21:22, 13 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Salut! Now, why would you remove links to redirects/ancient cities and point to modern cities? It was much cleaner that way, plus some of those redirects have potential for expansion based on the content from history sections within the corresponding modern cities. I would rather keep links to the ancient cities instead. --Codrin.B (talk) 04:32, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

And on top of it, many of those redirects from ancient city to modern city are actually {{R to section}}, pointing directly to the ancient history section of the modern city. I think that was very valuable too. Additionally, some question the continuity of some of the ancient cities till modern times, prompting for separation of the two concepts in different articles. Sorry to insist, but I think you should consider reverting the changes. I see mostly disadvantages. Unless you have a good reason that I miss. --Codrin.B (talk) 04:42, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your five articles DYK nomination

Hi there, your five articles DYK nomination awaits some further action from you. Schwede 66 20:34, 13 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I've commented further; can you please have a look? Thanks for your efforts, that's much appreciated. Schwede 66 01:46, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Bine Mai. You have new messages at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Dacia.
Message added 21:21, 13 January 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

If you wish, please provide input. Thanks and best regards. Codrin.B (talk) 21:21, 13 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summary

Before saving your changes to an article, please provide an edit summary. Doing so helps everyone understand the intention of your edit (and prevents legitimate edits from being mistaken for vandalism). It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. 1 edit summary from your 50 previous edits simply is not enough. --Jklamo (talk) 20:12, 15 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Giurgiu–Ruse pipeline

On 17 January 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Giurgiu–Ruse pipeline, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the planned Giurgiu–Ruse natural gas pipeline includes a 4.14 kilometres (3 mi) section to be built under the Danube river? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Thank you for this contribution to our second decade of wikipedia Victuallers (talk) 06:03, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for GSP Atlas

On 19 January 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article GSP Atlas, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the Romanian company Grup Servicii Petroliere owns five jackup independent leg cantilever drilling rigs: Atlas, Jupiter, Orizont, Prometeu and Saturn? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 00:06, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for GSP Jupiter

On 19 January 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article GSP Jupiter, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the Romanian company Grup Servicii Petroliere owns five jackup independent leg cantilever drilling rigs: Atlas, Jupiter, Orizont, Prometeu and Saturn? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 00:06, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for GSP Orizont

On 19 January 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article GSP Orizont, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the Romanian company Grup Servicii Petroliere owns five jackup independent leg cantilever drilling rigs: Atlas, Jupiter, Orizont, Prometeu and Saturn? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 00:07, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for GSP Prometeu

On 19 January 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article GSP Prometeu, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the Romanian company Grup Servicii Petroliere owns five jackup independent leg cantilever drilling rigs: Atlas, Jupiter, Orizont, Prometeu and Saturn? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 00:07, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for GSP Saturn

On 19 January 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article GSP Saturn, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the Romanian company Grup Servicii Petroliere owns five jackup independent leg cantilever drilling rigs: Atlas, Jupiter, Orizont, Prometeu and Saturn? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 00:07, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Merger

I proposed a merge of Kambaratinsk Dam into Kambar-Ati-1 Hydro Power Plant (an article you created). Please see the discussion here. Thanks.--NortyNort (Holla) 15:00, 21 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Online Ambassadors

I saw the quality of your contributions at DYK and clicked on over to your user page and was pretty impressed. Would you be interested in helping with the WP:Online_Ambassadors program? It's really a great opportunity to help university students become Wikipedia contributers. I hope you apply to become an ambassador, Sadads (talk) 01:14, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

More Romanian help

Hi again Bine Mai, I'm working on an article about Julian Assange's lawyer, (Mark Stephens (solicitor)) and have a source saying that he helped to draft freedom of information laws for Romania in 2005. I just wondered if you might be able to find anything about it in Romanian as my searches haven't turned up anything. It was in 2005 apparently. I'm trying to get a 5x expansion, but it might be tough so anything extra would be great. Thanks a lot. SmartSE (talk) 15:19, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Tarek Amer

The article Tarek Amer has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG, and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 01:04, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Emil Nanu

The article Emil Nanu has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 01:17, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

What's new?

Hey there! Long time no talk! What's new with you? What articles are you working on these days? Would you be interested to tackle this item from WP Dacia tasks?

Create Awards for WikiProject Dacia - Suggestion: could name contribution levels with comati, pileati, tarabostes.

Thought might be something you would like, based on your other banner work. Regards, --Codrin.B (talk) 17:41, 6 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Javad Mirzaev for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Javad Mirzaev is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Javad Mirzaev until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. The-Pope (talk) 16:40, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Göksu Hasancik

The article Göksu Hasancik has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 21:29, 3 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Dritan Krasniqi

The article Dritan Krasniqi has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 21:44, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Dejan Drakul

The article Dejan Drakul has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 02:09, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ignacio Lobella for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ignacio Lobella is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ignacio Lobella until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Argyle 4 Life^talk 18:00, 13 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Mistake/ambiguity Konin Coal Mine

Hi!
You are the author of the article Konin Coal Mine. Title of this article is ambiguous... If you want write about whole mine, you should titled this article "Kopalnia Węgla Brunatnego Konin" or (eng.: Brown Coal/Lignite Mine Konin). If you want write about pit lignite, you sholud titled this article "Pit of brown coal Pątnów" (Konin pit is official called Pątnów pit), because Jóźwin, Jóźwin IIB, Drzewce, Tomisławice, Kazimierz Północ (North), Kazimierz Południe (South), Morzysław, Niesłusz, Gosławice and Lubstów are/were pits of brown coal included in the "Kopalnia Węgla Brunatnego Konin", not separate coal mines. If something is unclear, leave me a message in my discussion page on PL Wiki (here). Flyz1 (talk) 22:47, 7 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Miljenko Bošnjak

The article Miljenko Bošnjak has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 23:41, 21 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Petar Matović

The article Petar Matović has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about footballer who hasn't played in a fully-pro league and which fails the general notability guideline.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jogurney (talk) 14:54, 8 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Barnstar of Good Humor
	As someone "owned by a chihuahua," I understand the "killer instinct" all too well. Joe Sewell (talk) 17:29, 8 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Survey for new page patrollers

New page patrol – Survey Invitation

Hello Bine Mai/Archive7! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.

If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only.
If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it.

Please click HERE to take part.
Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback.

You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey

Proposed deletion of Mkhitar Grigoryan

The article Mkhitar Grigoryan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 18:56, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of Wiki Media Foundation at 11:41, 25 October 2011 (UTC).[reply]

Proposed deletion of Gevorg Nranyan

The article Gevorg Nranyan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 16:14, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Nikolay Sargsyan

The article Nikolay Sargsyan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 18:17, 17 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Harutyun Hovhannisyan

The article Harutyun Hovhannisyan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 21:48, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Alexander John Cuza vs Alexandru Ioan Cuza

Please can you say your option about Alexander John Cuza vs Alexandru Ioan Cuza at Talk:Alexander_John_Cuza#Requested_move. -- Thanks, Saturnian (talk) 15:41, 2 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of foreign football players in the Czech Gambrinus liga 2010–11

The article List of foreign football players in the Czech Gambrinus liga 2010–11 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Looks like WP:OR and seems to be quite pointless.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Cloudz 679 09:33, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Vladimir Miljković

The article Vladimir Miljković has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 21:25, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of foreign football players in the Eredivisie 2010–11 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of foreign football players in the Eredivisie 2010–11 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of foreign football players in the Eredivisie 2010–11 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Cloudz 679 11:50, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of foreign football players in Liga I 2007–2008 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of foreign football players in Liga I 2007–2008 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of foreign football players in Liga I 2007–2008 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Cloudz 679 11:55, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of foreign football players in Liga I 2009–10 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of foreign football players in Liga I 2009–10 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of foreign football players in Liga I 2009–10 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Cloudz 679 11:56, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of foreign football players in the Ukrainian Premier League 2010–11 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of foreign football players in the Ukrainian Premier League 2010–11 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of foreign football players in the Ukrainian Premier League 2010–11 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Cloudz 679 11:58, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of foreign football players in the Swiss Super League 2010–11 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of foreign football players in the Swiss Super League 2010–11 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of foreign football players in the Swiss Super League 2010–11 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Cloudz 679 11:59, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of foreign football players in the Greek Superleague 2010–11 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of foreign football players in the Greek Superleague 2010–11 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of foreign football players in the Greek Superleague 2010–11 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Cloudz 679 12:00, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of foreign football players in the Jupiler Pro League 2010–11 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of foreign football players in the Jupiler Pro League 2010–11 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of foreign football players in the Jupiler Pro League 2010–11 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Cloudz 679 12:01, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of foreign football players in the Bulgarian A Professional Football Group 2010–11

The article List of foreign football players in the Bulgarian A Professional Football Group 2010–11 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Delete as unreferenced, original research and orphaned article

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Cloudz 679 12:03, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of foreign football players in the Ligue 1 2010–11

The article List of foreign football players in the Ligue 1 2010–11 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Delete as unreferenced, original research and orphaned article

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Cloudz 679 12:03, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of foreign football players in Liga I 2008–2009

The article List of foreign football players in Liga I 2008–2009 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Delete as unreferenced, original research and orphaned article

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Cloudz 679 12:04, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of foreign football players in the Cypriot First Division 2010–11

The article List of foreign football players in the Cypriot First Division 2010–11 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Delete as unreferenced, original research and orphaned article

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Cloudz 679 12:05, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of foreign football players in the Fußball-Bundesliga 2010–11

The article List of foreign football players in the Fußball-Bundesliga 2010–11 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Delete as unreferenced, original research and orphaned article

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Cloudz 679 12:05, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of foreign football players in the Danish Superliga 2010–11

The article List of foreign football players in the Danish Superliga 2010–11 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Delete as unreferenced, original research and orphaned article

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Cloudz 679 12:07, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of foreign football players in the Austrian Bundesliga 2010–11

The article List of foreign football players in the Austrian Bundesliga 2010–11 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Delete as unreferenced, original research and orphaned article

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Cloudz 679 12:08, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of foreign football players in the Polish Ekstraklasa 2010–11

The article List of foreign football players in the Polish Ekstraklasa 2010–11 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Delete as unreferenced, original research and orphaned article

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Cloudz 679 12:09, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Tomis Mall

The article Tomis Mall has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Relatively small, non-notable shopping mall.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Epeefleche (talk) 07:59, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Someşul Mall

The article Someşul Mall has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Relatively small, non-notable mall.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Epeefleche (talk) 08:01, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Plaza Europa, Satu Mare

The article Plaza Europa, Satu Mare has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable small shopping mall.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Epeefleche (talk) 18:56, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Arena Mall Bacău

The article Arena Mall Bacău has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

25,000 sq m mall; non-notable.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Epeefleche (talk) 06:12, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Grand Mall, Satu Mare

The article Grand Mall, Satu Mare has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable, 50 store mall.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Epeefleche (talk) 07:11, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Romania nuke plant map

Template:Romania nuke plant map has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. mabdul 21:32, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Alia Apartments

The article Alia Apartments has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No reliable sources at all. An unremarkable residential project, with an unknown status.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. - Andrei (talk) 08:30, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Babadag Wind Farm for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Babadag Wind Farm is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Babadag Wind Farm until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. - Andrei (talk) 08:54, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

I'm trying to get people who are willing to help me out with a pet project I've begun but realised that it will be extremely hard for me to even make a small dent in. First of all, I got your name from the list of active members on the wikiproject for mining articles. Please disregard this, if you're not interested.

So, here's what I'm trying to do and what you could do to help me. I noticed that there were very few articles that list mines. I've tried (to the best of my abilities) to create a sub-page that lists all of the probable articles for lists of mines that I could think of, you can review this here.

Basically, I need help. Suggestions on different lists to add, I need lists created, if the lede I've been using should be changed, I'd like community consensus on the standard layout (I've been going with listing articles like List of gold mines by country and List of mines in the United States by output. If someone would like to make templates for these articles.

Please, don't feel obligated. I came to you, and others like you because of your implied interest in mining articles. List articles are not exactly in everyone's taste. If you are completely uninterested, but think you might know someone who might be, please let them know about it. I could use all the help I can get.

Oh, and if you happen to create any new articles on mines, please add them to any of my recently created lists. Sorry for this being so wordy, have a good day and happy editing! Ncboy2010 (talk) 22:25, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Râmnicu Sărat Wind Farm for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Râmnicu Sărat Wind Farm is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Râmnicu Sărat Wind Farm until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. - Andrei (talk) 15:01, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Andrew Konopelsky

The article Andrew Konopelsky has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mattythewhite (talk) 19:14, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Request for help concerning energy...

Hi,

I noticed you listed yourself as a participant of the Energy WikiProject.

There are 2 new outlines in this area that attempt to consolidate Wikipedia's coverage of their respective subjects, gathering and organizing the articles about them into one place and including descriptions for convenience. The purposes of these outlines are to make it easier for readers to survey or review a whole subject, and to choose from Wikipedia's many articles about it.

The new energy outlines are:

Outline of solar energy
Outline of wind energy

Please take a look at them, and....

if you spot missing topics, add them in.

if you can, improve the descriptions.

add missing descriptions.

show parent-offspring relationships (with indents).

fix errors.

For more information about the format and functions of outlines, see Wikipedia:Outlines.

Building outlines of existing material (such as Wikipedia) is called "reverse outlining". Reverse outlines are useful as a revision tool, for identifying gaps in coverage and for spotting poor structuring.

Revising a work with multiple articles (such as Wikipedia) is a little different than revising a paper. But the general principles are the same...

As you develop these outlines, you may notice things about the articles they organize. Like what topics are not adequately covered, better ways to structure and present the material, awkward titles, articles that need splitting, article sections lacking {{Main}} links, etc.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Outlines.

Thank you. Sincerely, The Transhumanist 00:45, 2 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

P.S.: see also Outline of energy

Proposed deletion of Kenneth Kronholm

The article Kenneth Kronholm has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable footballer who is yet to play in a fully-professional league.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. J Mo 101 (talk) 23:57, 14 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Garnik Hovhannisyan for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Garnik Hovhannisyan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Garnik Hovhannisyan (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Mattythewhite (talk) 16:36, 17 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Joel Kiki

The article Joel Kiki has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 10:02, 7 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ghenadie Ochincă

The article Ghenadie Ochincă has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 10:19, 7 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of André Gonçalves Marques

The article André Gonçalves Marques has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Giant Snowman 11:54, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Gabriel Abraham

The article Gabriel Abraham has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 17:16, 14 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Miki Kjeldsen

The article Miki Kjeldsen has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication this individual meets WP:GNG

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Cloudz 679 17:56, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Euro Tower

The article Euro Tower has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Future project which has not started construction so notability is tenuous at best.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Wkharrisjr (talk) 21:03, 6 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Infrastructure of Satu Mare for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Infrastructure of Satu Mare is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Infrastructure of Satu Mare until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Proposed deletion of Colosseum Tower Bucharest

The article Colosseum Tower Bucharest has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Canceled building project

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. bogdan (talk) 17:44, 10 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Chiatura mine

Hello! Your submission of Chiatura mine at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Δρ.Κ. ^{λόγοςπράξις} 15:22, 21 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Egger (company)

The article Egger (company) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article is about a company but sourced only to the company website and promotional in nature. I can't find any independent, reliable coverage about Egger. Blatantly fails WP:NCORP notability criteria.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sionk (talk) 15:54, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Egger (company), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page MW (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:38, 1 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Chiatura mine

Hello! Your submission of Chiatura mine at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! —♦♦ AMBER^(ЯʘCK) 10:41, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Capital Top 300 wealthiest men in Romania

The article Capital Top 300 wealthiest men in Romania has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unsourced. outdated.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Koppapa (talk) 11:55, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Voorspoed diamond mine, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Carats (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:50, 22 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm Darkesthoursoflife. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Brisas mine, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. Darkesthoursoflife (talk) 11:38, 22 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Uranium mines in Namibia

Hi Bine mai, namibnut again about uranium. I am slowly figuring out how things work, so apologies if this is the wrong way to address these issues. After reading about Aussinanis and writing a message to you, I clicked on the Uranium mines in Namibia link and now realize you have made all the entries there. May I point out some detail that might just be important as far as Wikipedia is concerned. There is a major distinction between a mine and an exploration project. Currently only Rössing, Langer Heinrich, Trekkopje and Husab can be called mines. Husab is in the process of construction, so one can call it a mine. Valencia is called a mine because there is a signboard on the road that says "Valencia mine", but they never advanced beyond the mid-exploration phase. The reality is that none of the other projects are further than advanced exploration. Even Trekkopje is technically still constructing, but have actually shut down because of the poor economy. Some of the Reptile projects (e.g. Omahola) and Zhonge Resources have received mining licences but it is unlikely that they will be developed soon; the uranium price is far too low for economical extraction and will remain like that for some time to come. Namibnut (talk) 10:16, 26 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Aussinanis mine Namibia

Hi Bine mai Please advise me. I noticed your name on the revision history for "Aussinanis mine" in Namibia. I am curious where you got this information, since it is wrong, this mine does not exist. To have an open pit mine generally there should be an open pit. But there is none. I can send photos if you like. The reference given for the erroneous information also does not mention anything about it being such a "large" deposit. It is only a low-grade deposit of uranium known since the 1960s. The Aussinanis project is still in the exploration phase. I know all this since I work 5km from the deposit and drive by there very often. I honestly think this deposit does not warrant a Wiki inscription. It is relatively small and low grade and currently uneconomical. Its only newsworthy value is that the state-owned mining company Epangelo has obtained a share in it. This whole entry should be deleted. But I don't know how to do this. Apologies if this sounds stupid, but I have never had to do anything like this before. Namibnut (talk) 11:32, 26 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Aussinanis mine

Again apologies for not understanding how this Wiki "talk" thing works - I now by accident stumbled upon your answer to me, but have no idea how to respond other than starting a new message. The issue of Aussinanis mine is sensitive, hence my response. If they should go ahead, they will threaten the existence of the Gobabeb Research and Training Centre, as well as settlements of the Topnaar people living along the Kuiseb River. There has been much concern about this in Namibia - articles that state that there exists an actual mine is WRONG, and will only serve to confuse the whole debate. More importantly, the citation you gave for the entry about Aussinanis mine clearly does NOT state anything of the sort. It does not say that it is a "large open pit mine". Here is the sum total of text where Aussinanis is mentioned:

"Reptile's Aussinanis project, also a palaeochannel deposit, near the coast about 60km south of the others. It has 6976 tU indicated and inferred resources at about 0.02%U, and the hydrocyclone technology tested on TRS has potential application here. . In January 2013 Deep Yellow agreed with Namibia's Epangelo to transfer its Aussinanis and Ripnes projects into a new company, Yellow Dune Uranium Resources Ltd. Epangelo acquired a 5% stake in Yellow Dune to fund test work and confirm that the Aussinanis deposit can be upgraded by beneficiation. Reptile holds 85% and Oponona Investments 10%. If the test work at Aussinanis is successful, Epangelo will become the operator of the joint venture and would earn up to 70% in Yellow Dune by funding the project through to a bankable feasibility study. Reptile's holding would then shrink to 20%."

More information is available on Deep Yellow's website.

Surely a key aspect of Wikipedia is that sources should be correctly cited?

Please correct the entry.

Namibnut (talk) 11:44, 26 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Oil shale mines in Serbia

Hi, Bine Mai. You created a number of articles about oil shale mines in Serbia. However, these are not mines but deposits. There is no oil shale mines in Serbia at the moment or any oil shale industry. Beagel (talk) 20:20, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Bine Mai

I'm sending you this because you've made quite a few edits to the template namespace in the past couple of months. If I've got this wrong, or if I haven't but you're not interested in my request, don't worry; this is the only notice I'm sending out on the subject :).

So, as you know (or should know - we sent out a centralnotice and several watchlist notices) we're planning to deploy the VisualEditor on Monday, 1 July, as the default editor. For those of us who prefer markup editing, fear not; we'll still be able to use the markup editor, which isn't going anywhere.

What's important here, though, is that the VisualEditor features an interactive template inspector; you click an icon on a template and it shows you the parameters, the contents of those fields, and human-readable parameter names, along with descriptions of what each parameter does. Personally, I find this pretty awesome, and from Monday it's going to be heavily used, since, as said, the VisualEditor will become the default.

The thing that generates the human-readable names and descriptions is a small JSON data structure, loaded through an extension called TemplateData. I'm reaching out to you in the hopes that you'd be willing and able to put some time into adding TemplateData to high-profile templates. It's pretty easy to understand (heck, if I can write it, anyone can) and you can find a guide here, along with a list of prominent templates, although I suspect we can all hazard a guess as to high-profile templates that would benefit from this. Hopefully you're willing to give it a try; the more TemplateData sections get added, the better the interface can be. If you run into any problems, drop a note on the Feedback page.

Thanks, Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 21:42, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Koridor coal mine

Hi Bine Mai, Thanks for your contributions about various mines in Turkey. But I couldn't find a source about so-called Koridor coal mine. I also checked your 19-pages source, still no luck. Can you please specify the page. Happy editting. Nedim Ardoğa (talk) 09:44, 4 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your immediate reply. I looked up for the mine named Koridor on the map. I am afraid this is not a mine. Koridor in Turkish means "aisle" (corridor) and the name aisle on the map seems to represent the empty area between two mining sites (Collolar coal mine and Kışlaköy coal mine). Cheers. Nedim Ardoğa (talk) 12:15, 4 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]