User talk:Bine Mai/Archive5

barnstar

for signing my user page, here is a barnstar

The Orangesodakid Guestbook Page Barnstar

This user has signed orangesodakid's signature page.

regards--Orange soda kid 21:46, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

List of Romanian counties by foreign trade

Please, ignore my personal remarks. Only consider the modifications I made and issues I raised. Try to ignore the tone in which they are made, please. About Bucharest and Ilfov County, this is not the first time in WP some people mess them up. Many maps do not show Bucharest separately, for example. I find it very disturbing when people create maps and don't bother learning the basic facts first. But let's ignore my disturbance and concentrate of the issues. Data for Bucharest and Ilfov County must be separated. Second, for exports I get 64,380.4. I hope I am wrong, but could you, please double check this. I hope you are using Excel and are not doing this manually (I did it manually). Dc76\^talk 16:35, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Look, I appreciate the effort you are putting in this list. But recognize it: it is not a straightforward list to make; there are many subtle issues. Just a suggestion: add the names of the companies to the Economy sections of each county article, and link from the table to them (to the Economy sections of County articles). Dc76\^talk 16:52, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re:

Hope the next one to get in it won't be an admin...Anonimu (talk) 17:18, 31 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm suggesting nothing. Your comments there are in breach of Wikipedia's civility policy, and any admin can safely block you. If you have personal disputes with someone, please take them out of WP.Anonimu (talk) 17:29, 31 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AN/I notice

Hello, Bine Mai. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Dahn (talk) 19:26, 31 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

October 2009

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for serial copyright violations, as discussed at WP:ANI at [1]. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Sandstein 21:04, 31 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

[2] HalfShadow (talk) 21:06, 31 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mario1987

A request for checkuser has been filed. If you wish to respond to it please post here; the clerks and checkusers have been referred to this page. Durova³⁵¹ 16:33, 1 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bine Mai (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I do admit of using sockpuppets because i can't help it. Contributing to wikipedia had become more like a daily habit for me (i could say that i'm addicted) but you can check that my socks didn't do any vandalism or things like that, only added new articles or corrected old ones. You can check if you don't believe what i say. When i see a mistake on a wiki article i automatically try to solv it. The same goes for new articles. Everyday i see new sources for new articles but obviouslly i can't do anything about it because of my block. But you should know that User:Reywashere and User:Mrtvi Nhad are not my socks. The rest are. Regarding copyvios i admit of misusing different pics for various reasons but only wanted to enhance the quality of an article i created. If i will be unblocked i promise NEVER to upload a pic or image to Wikipedia again as long as i remain an editor. And that's a promise. If i don't get unblocked than thanks for your time. Mario1987 13:46, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

"I do admit of using sockpuppets because i can't help it." Then we'll have to keep you blocked. — Daniel Case (talk) 15:08, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

my mistake should have been: I do admit of using sockpuppets because i couldn't help it. Mario1987 15:50, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bine Mai (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The above sentence should have been I do admit of using sockpuppets because i couldn't help it but let's get over that. Regarding the copyright thing i promise i will never upload an image or logo to Wiki as long as i remain an editor. If i break my promise than i will willingly quit Wikipedia and never return. I know what i did was wrong and that my behavior was offensive to other editors but i assure you that i've changet in this time since i was blocked because i realised that Wikipedia represented a small (but significant) part of my daily life and that depriving me of this routine (because of my own fault) left me feeling very poor at an intelectual level. In this time i managed to gather my thoughts and realise what i did was wrong but in the same time found different ideas that could be materialised in new articles and a couple of new FL's. So i please urge you to reconsider my block under a good faith oath and the promise to never again upload a picture to this encyclopedia. Hope to hear positive things from you. Thanks and cheers. PS: I would also like to appologise to the editor(s) that i was in conflict in the last period. Mario1987 13:15, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

"I do admit of using sockpuppets because i couldn't help it but let's get over that". No. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 16:42, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Try to review without the first sentence because it was for the first unblock request not this one

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bine Mai (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Regarding the copyright thing i promise i will never upload an image or logo to Wiki as long as i remain an editor. If i break my promise than i will willingly quit Wikipedia and never return. I know what i did was wrong and that my behavior was offensive to other editors but i assure you that i've changet in this time since i was blocked because i realised that Wikipedia represented a small (but significant) part of my daily life and that depriving me of this routine (because of my own fault) left me feeling very poor at an intelectual level. In this time i managed to gather my thoughts and realise what i did was wrong but in the same time found different ideas that could be materialised in new articles and a couple of new FL's. So i please urge you to reconsider my block under a good faith oath and the promise to never again upload a picture to this encyclopedia. Hope to hear positive things from you. Thanks and cheers. PS: I would also like to appologise to the editor(s) that i was in conflict in the last period and i assure you that my sockpupeteering days are over. Mario1987 17:26, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Serial copyright violations? Sockpuppetry? A user with your experience should have known better. Continued abuse of this template will result in your talk page access being revoked. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 03:12, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

AfD nomination of Yashar Abuzerov

An article that you have been involved in editing, Yashar Abuzerov, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yashar Abuzerov. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Giant Snowman 15:59, 23 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Elman Abdurrahmanov

An article that you have been involved in editing, Elman Abdurrahmanov, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elman Abdurrahmanov. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Giant Snowman 15:59, 23 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Mario1987! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 18 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 318 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

Fabian Teuşan - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Gaston Mendy - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Nemanja Vidaković - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Eduardo Simões - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Luis Dias - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Hugo Santos - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Roberto Ayza - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Celestino Marques Silva Ilnhasse - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Jaka Stromajer - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Jackson Jose Lucas - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

More...
11. Srđan Žakula 12. Fernando Michel Costa 13. Slavko Vucković 14. Ghenadie Ochincă 15. Diego de Gregorio 16. Andriy Fedorenko 17. Youssouf Kamara 18. Radoslav Kunzo

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 20:05, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination of Category:Trilulilu

I have nominated Category:Trilulilu (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Pcap ping 20:31, 27 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hope

Hello Mario, by accident I came to your talk page and I noticed you were blocked. I noticed that we intersected in many articles about Romanian economy. I just want to say that I hope you will manage to come back to Wikipedia. I don't know exactly what the situation was, maybe the people you had conflicts with made bigger errors than you, I have no idea. Really I don't know that and I have no time to search for it. What I could see is that you made errors for sure. Suggesting that you can get personal data about others is a serious error. Nobody can accept to be stalked. If others made errors, they have to suffer the consequences, but you can't help to make that happen by making errors too. If I would be blocked, I might feel tempted to make clones, like you did, just because I can't help it, like you said. Because I love this project and I believe in it, and I want to do something useful. So I wish you all well, and I hope you love this project (and above that, to love to share useful information) enough to come back and to admit that you made errors. If you do that well, then I am sure you will be able to manage to make your way back. No punishment can be unlimited, for a limited and not a very severe fault. Take care ! Ark25 (talk) 22:29, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the kind words :). 86.126.214.104 (talk) 15:04, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Vishay Intertechnology

The article Vishay Intertechnology has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable company. All Google news hits are press releases.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Simon-in-sagamihara (talk) 09:38, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Pape Omar Faye

He just not played for Argeş. Matthew_hk t c 10:39, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request

Header added. AGK 23:35, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

{{Unblock on hold|reason=while waiting for comments from the community.|1=Sandstein|2=First of all i would like to say hello to eveyone and i would like to congratulate you for doing a very good job with this project. In these past 10 months since i've been blocked i realised that i was a jerk and what i did was wrong and such behaviour is considered offensive to other contributors and is not tolerable. Yes i've been foolish and many times desperate regarding my contributions, and more specifically the amount of my contributions, trying to impress god knows who with many good/bad articles and DYK nominations. I don't know maybe it was a personal ambition to be as high as possible in the lists regarding user by edit count or by DYK nominations or was it simply madness!? Nonetheless i believe that during this time when i was inactive (with a few hickups at the beginning of the year) i was able to put my thoughts in order and release my mind from these "ambitions" and personal faults. I know that my previous block was lifted as a friendly gesture and a sign of good faith but i blew it and i would like to appologise to all those people that believed in me and got dissappointed by my actions. So in conclusion i would like to ask you for another chance to be a contributor to this wonderful project and i hope that your decision will be favorable for everyone. Thank you very much for your time. Mario1987 20:27, 16 August 2010 (UTC)|3=Beeblebrox (talk) 21:05, 16 August 2010 (UTC)}}[reply]

Given that you were blocked after a community discussion it would not be appropriate for a single admin to unblock you, so this will be going back to WP:ANI. Any statement you would like to make here can be copied over to there. Beeblebrox (talk) 21:05, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A few users have suggested that they would be more comfortable if you had a mentor. Would you be willing to enter the adopt a user program or seek out a mentor through some other means? Beeblebrox (talk) 22:37, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes i would be willing to do so. Mario1987 07:06, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for expressing an interest in returning to editing. If at any point you want to reply to a comment made at ANI in relation to your unblock request, add it to this section along with "{{helpme}}" (without the quote marks) and somebody will copy it over. Regards, AGK 23:35, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
{{helpme}}

I saw that one users want to know if i made contributions to other projects and i would like to say that i have a few on the Romanian Wiki here. Mario1987 08:47, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Copying over to ANI. Chzz ► 08:55, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Several users who currently oppose unblocking you have indicated that if you gave a more detailed explanation of what you did that merited blocking they might be willing to reconsider. Beeblebrox (talk) 17:47, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

{{helpme}}

Ok then. First of all i believe i was indefinitely blocked in October because of massive copyright violations regarding many pictures i uploaded to the project from a wide range of fields and places and claimed that they were made by me which obviously wasn't true. The only pictures made by myself were the ones from a HP Photosmart M537 digital camera, the other ones were from various websites, forums and other online places. My second problem was related to sockpuppets or as one user called it in the past operating a sock farm :). I admit i created many socks in the intent of helping me with various FPC's and other content. Another reason why i created socks is to evade my block because i simply couldn't realise in my mind that a ban is intended to stop a user from contributing poor referenced articles or stop disruptive behaviour. I can say that i was addicted to contributing almost anything to Wikipedia and since the ban stops you from doing just that i tried to evade it by all means without thinking and without realizing the consequences involved. These were my actions in the past for whom i don't have any excuse and for whom i deeply appologise and i hope that i detailed enough for you all. The rest is up o you. Have i nice day/night. Mario1987 19:54, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'll copy this to the ANI thread. Beeblebrox (talk) 20:07, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):

It is with some hesitation that I have unblocked you. Several users rightly expressed the concern that you already had a last chance and you blew it. The admin who blocked you also does not really support you being unblocked. There is a strong feeling that you should be closely monitored and seek guidance for any editing. I strongly advise you to avoid uploading images altogether for the time being. One single infraction of copyright policy will lead to the rapid re-instatement of this block, and it's unlikely you would ever be unblocked again after that.

Request handled by: Beeblebrox (talk)

Unblocking administrator: Please check for active autoblocks on this user after accepting the unblock request.

Also, as a piece of advise from me (Heymid), I suggest you to only upload images taken by yourself, which is the safest and guaranteed way of avoiding copyright violations (if you still want to upload images). /Hey Mid (contributions) 20:02, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]