User talk:Bimple

Welcome!

Hello, Bimple, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like Susie Milani, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Oda Mari (talk) 18:40, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Susie Milani

A tag has been placed on Susie Milani requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Oda Mari (talk) 18:40, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Dave Sharp (bass guitarist)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Dave Sharp (bass guitarist) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Logan _Talk ^{Contributions} 18:43, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Florganoleptic

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Florganoleptic requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Niftysquirrel (talk) 23:40, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Florganoleptic for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Florganoleptic is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Florganoleptic until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Citing (talk) 17:09, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Move Notice

Hello Bimple,

I have moved Draft:Bimple to Draft:The Brain That Wouldn't Die (musical) because that is the actual name.

Thanks! Myrealnamm (💬pros · ✏️cons) 21:38, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

thank you! I edited that version you created and submitted it Bimple (talk) 21:56, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The template at the top still needs to be there. Do you want to submit the draft for review? Myrealnamm (💬pros · ✏️cons) 22:00, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

We don't need duplicates of drafts, the redirect at Draft:Bimple is enough. Thanks! Myrealnamm (💬pros · ✏️cons) 22:17, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Timothy Henning moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Timothy Henning. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and unreliable sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 15:12, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you @BoyTheKingCanDance for reviewing the draft of the Timothy Henning article and for your constructive feedback. I’ve made several updates based on your suggestions:

Increased Notability:

Added more reliable and independent sources to establish notability.

Included additional details on Timothy Henning’s significant contributions and notable productions.

Addressed Unreliable Sources:

Removed unreliable sources and replaced them with credible references.

Ensured all sources are reputable and relevant.

Draft Updates:

Integrated the new references and citations.

Revised the content to ensure it meets Wikipedia’s standards for neutrality and verifiability.

I’ve also added relevant WikiProject tags as advised. I believe these changes have improved the draft and addressed the issues raised. Please let me know if there are any further adjustments needed.

Thank you for your time and assistance! Bimple (talk) 16:58, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you @BoyTheKingCanDance for reviewing the draft of the Timothy Henning article and for your constructive feedback. I’ve made several updates based on your suggestions:

Increased Notability:
- Added more reliable and independent sources to establish notability.
- Included additional details on Timothy Henning’s significant contributions and notable productions.
Addressed Unreliable Sources:
- Removed unreliable sources and replaced them with credible references.
- Ensured all sources are reputable and relevant.
Draft Updates:
- Integrated the new references and citations.
- Revised the content to ensure it meets Wikipedia’s standards for neutrality and verifiability.

I’ve also added relevant WikiProject tags as advised. I believe these changes have improved the draft and addressed the issues raised. Please let me know if there are any further adjustments needed.

Thank you for your time and assistance! Bimple (talk) 17:10, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Timothy Henning (September 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Timothy Henning and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 (talk) 17:44, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Bimple! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! S0091 (talk) 17:44, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Brain That Wouldn't Die! (The Musical), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Downfall and Horror. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 19:56, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Brain That Wouldn't Die! (The Musical) moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to The Brain That Wouldn't Die! (The Musical). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Lord Bolingbroke (talk) 20:56, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]