User talk:Biman1989

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

--⋙–DBig Xrayᗙ 12:41, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

February 2020

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would like you to assume good faith while interacting with other editors, which you did not do on Talk:North East Delhi riots. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. ⋙–DBig Xrayᗙ 12:42, 27 February 2020 (UTC) Biman1989 (talk) 12:50, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I respect your opinion but I politely asked a clarification which you didn't answer instead you threatened me. I have every right to ask clarification. I assume good faith too. I m not at all doubting you. consider it as a clarification. Request you not to jump to conclusion and judge me immediately.

Please WP:SIGN and WP:INDENT your reply. Please provide WP:DIFF of the comment where You think I have threatened you ? I have never threatened you and you are blatantly lying. --⋙–DBig Xrayᗙ 12:55, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I can not understand why are you taking it personally. Do I have any personal enmity with you? Nooo. We both are trying to improve a page so that others can read the true picture in future. That is the only motto. I could not understand why you became angry when i mentioned your name. It was a reference just. Not insulting you. Disappoint to see that your emotion is prevailing over your thinking. Sorry.--Biman1989 (talk) 13:00, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have no right to attack anyone on wikipedia article talk page. You are free to disagree with me and have different opinion. but you cannot attack others. Please follow WP:NPA and wP:CIVIL and keep your comment focussed only on the topic of the thread in discussion and nothing else.

You should now remove the attacking lines from your comment that you made on the talk page. ⋙–DBig Xrayᗙ 13:03, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I will remove attacking lines. Cheers.--Biman1989 (talk) 13:05, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Biman1989, Thank you. ⋙–DBig Xrayᗙ 13:06, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Since you have removed the attacks, I have also removed my comments that you called offensive. Now lets focus on the topic. ⋙–DBig Xrayᗙ 13:22, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

yeah great mat. But for strange reason I saw you continuously defending Tahir Hussain with other guys. The reason why Tahir Hussain and Kapil Mishra's name are emerging more than anyone else is that both are elected members and there are more responsibility on them. When elected members gives hate speeches or uses their building to create riots. both provoked common public to do hate mongering. I agree that Tahir Hussainis still not proved guilty only FIR lodged but same applied to Kapil mishra also. No proof gathered where you can say bcoz of kapil Mishra's speech it happened. So using you logic in one's case and ignoring it for other's case is bias. Wikipedia is not a personal blog. People will read year after year so as a responsible user we must produce both the case not one sided. Request you o reconsider your view.--Biman1989 (talk) 06:00, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Biman1989, The speech of Kapil Mishra is all over the internet where he is seen threatening. Kapil mishra is a notable person per wP:NPOL , Tahir is not notable. WP:BLPNAME applies. We have certain policies in dealing with the living people topic and it is strictly followed. I am not a his supporter. All I am saying is, he has to be formally convicted in a court of law for us to be able to write about him. Please click and read these links I gave. ⋙–DBig Xrayᗙ 07:17, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Agree to disagree bro. May be you are already prejudicial or politically/religiously leaned, which shouldn't happen as a Wikipedia editor. That is why you are ignoring all facts. U rely NDTV more than anything. According to you TOI is BJP/Hindutva leaned but NDTV is neutral. Good Luck. --Biman1989 (talk) 11:41, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It doesn't matter whether you agree or disagree. Wikipedia is written according to reliable sources. If you cannot follow the reliable sources, you are of no use to Wikipedia. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 07:07, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

With all due respect Kautilya3 I am extremely sorry to say that your reliable sources changes according to situation. Times Of India, India today Hindustan times are totally according according to reliable sources not only NDTV. Similarly opindia, republictv,thewire are not reliable sources. If you can't figure it out it is upto you. --Biman1989 (talk) 09:42, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you know reliable sources, then please cite them for your agreement/disagreement. Simply saying you disagree serves no purpose. Tahir Hussain wasn't being "defended". DBigXray and I simply did not find any facts that established his involvement. We still don't. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 09:53, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

By similar logic is there any fact that establish Kapil Mishra's involvement in riot apart from speech. I am pointing to only this logic if you don't have fact to establish both proper involvement then why highlight one fact and hide another. this is not according to WP:NPOV I hope u understand my confusion.Thanks --Biman1989 (talk) 10:00, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There is no relationship or comparison between the two people you are discussing. You need to stop doing it, if you want to be taken seriously. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 10:09, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You are running out of logic. I understand that. Cheers. There is huge comparison between these two names because of socio-political context. If you deny that is understandable. Look those who want to take my view seriously can take it and those who don't want to take it seriously can reject it. --Biman1989 (talk) 10:17, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I think we should stop this discussion here and concentrate on relevant matter. --Biman1989 (talk) 10:26, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

Hello, Biman1989, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page – I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Table of contents / Department directory

The Wikipedia Adventure (a tutorial orienting you with Wikipedia)
The Signpost, our newspaper

Need help?

Questions – a guide on where to ask questions
Cheatsheet – quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes
Wikipedia's 5 pillars – an overview of Wikipedia's foundations

Article wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
The simplified ruleset – a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules
Guide to Wikipedia – a thorough step-by-step guide to Wikipedia

How you can help:

Contributing to Wikipedia – a guide on how you can help

Community portal – Wikipedia's hub of activity

Additional tips...

Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.
If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills without changing the mainspace, the Sandbox is for you.

Biman1989, good luck, and have fun. Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 20:13, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse Invitation

Hello! Biman1989, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 20:13, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

February 2020

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Talk:North East Delhi riots. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

diff

You are again engaging in attacking editors. Consider this final warning. ⋙–DBig Xrayᗙ 06:10, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on Talk:North East Delhi riots. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. diff ⋙–DBig Xrayᗙ 06:13, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make personal attacks on other people, as you did at Talk:North East Delhi riots. Comment on content, not on fellow editors. diff ⋙–DBig Xrayᗙ 06:17, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Consider this final warning. "??? As if you are the President?? Don't threaten just because you have more experience. Nobody has given you freedom to threaten which you are continuously doing. Earlier you used a "F" word against me then removed. Try not to consider Wikipedia as your personal blog. maintain WP:NPOV and maintain good behaviour WP:WQ. As as experienced moderator which you should have known but didn't. About your allegation of stop attacking, I didn't mention any editor's name but I definitely will be careful and try not to engage.--Biman1989 (talk) 06:32, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Final warning, before you are blocked or sanctioned by an admin for your incessant vitriol against the editors here.

Claiming that you are no longer taking names, isn't going to help really. Admins are quite smart here. see wP:TE --⋙–DBig Xrayᗙ 06:46, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. But, Congrats you are in news Check https://winkreport.com/wikipedia-article-on-delhi-riots-refuses-to-include-violence-by-muslims/ --Biman1989 (talk) 09:09, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Arbitration enforcement block

To enforce an arbitration decision you have been blocked from editing for a period of one month. You are welcome to edit once the block expires; however, please note that the repetition of similar behavior may result in a longer block or other sanctions.

If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the guide to appealing blocks (specifically this section) before appealing. Place the following on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Please copy my appeal to the [[WP:AE|arbitration enforcement noticeboard]] or [[WP:AN|administrators' noticeboard]]. Your reason here OR place the reason below this template. ~~~~}}. If you intend to appeal on the arbitration enforcement noticeboard I suggest you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template on your talk page so it can be copied over easily. You may also appeal directly to me (by email), before or instead of appealing on your talk page.

Reminder to administrators: In May 2014, ArbCom adopted the following procedure instructing administrators regarding Arbitration Enforcement blocks: "No administrator may modify a sanction placed by another administrator without: (1) the explicit prior affirmative consent of the enforcing administrator; or (2) prior affirmative agreement for the modification at (a) AE or (b) AN or (c) ARCA (see "Important notes" [in the procedure]). Administrators modifying sanctions out of process may at the discretion of the committee be desysopped."

El_C 13:54, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

February 2020

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 15:36, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]