User talk:BimBamBroom

welcome

Welcome!

Hi BimBamBroom! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Bearian (talk) 14:30, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is not a forum

Hi BimBamBroom, when editing article talk pages, please focus on the respective article's content rather than personal opinion statements about Wikipedia in general. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 23:14, 17 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This strikes me as a little pendantic. Do you comment police every SINGLE comment someone makes just because you disagree with them. Even on the Talk Page. Wow! BimBamBroom (talk) 00:30, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently been editing post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people which has been designated a contentious topic. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially-designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;

comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;

follow editorial and behavioural best practice;

comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and

refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Doug Weller talk 20:23, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

February 2023

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at ReAwaken America Tour, you may be blocked from editing. Here you clearly misrepresented the source with an edit summary "C'mon sons!". Doug Weller talk 08:08, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Doug Weller. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Glenn Close, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Doug Weller talk 08:08, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

And what did you meant by "C'mon sons!"?

Doug Weller talk 08:08, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Are you psycho

What is wrong with you.

Seriously... BimBamBroom (talk) 07:29, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Link please for the revert on Glen Close you claim I did. It was unsourced so deletion would be within policy, obviously, but I don’t see a deletion/revert. Doug Weller talk 21:45, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

February 2023

You have been blocked from editing from certain pages (ReAwaken America Tour) for a period of 1 week for Disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Doug Weller talk 08:10, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've modified your block to site-wide due to your personal attacks. If the disruption continues you'll lose access to this page as well.-- Ponyo^{bons mots} 21:40, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Fuck....YOU!

PS Thanks for providing the proof I needed, sons... BimBamBroom (talk) 23:45, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. Ponyo^{bons mots} 23:56, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]