User talk:BillxMach

A belated welcome!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, BillxMach. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! Jauerback^dude?/_dude. 02:37, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

November 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Sports-related curses may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

the Cleveland Browns in the NFL and AFC championships never won the Super Bowl directly afterwards (The [[Baltimore Colts]] lost [[Super Bowl III|III]], the [[Minnesota Vikings]] lost [[Super Bowl IV|

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 02:33, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2014 Minnesota Vikings season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Harrison Smith. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Teddy Bridgewater, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Anthony Barr. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:26, 28 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Game summaries

I'm sure I've said this before, and if so, I apologise, but I feel it needed saying again. Don't get me wrong, I appreciate the work you put into writing the Vikings game summaries, but the tone of your writing doesn't really feel appropriate for an encyclopaedia. I know you've noticed some of the changes I've made to your work in the past, and I wonder if you might start emulating the style that I use in my game summaries. I'm not saying my style is perfect – in fact, it's probably a little bland – but it's worth looking at if you get the chance. – Pee Jay 20:54, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'd be a fool to say the criticism was unnecessary. It's actually helped me out a lot since having started editing here. Noticing some of your additions to what I've written go in-depth and are more descriptive of each scoring play or other big plays, I've tended to go the simple route with a more brief description that while pretty good for adding upon, in and of itself may not be the description to stick by in the long run. This being said, I'll take the time to look at some of your game descriptions as an example, and maybe take some other appropriate examples as well where they fit. It's good to be a contributor, yes. But obviously to yield more ideal results a deal of insight is necessary. — Bill Mach – contribs - talk – 21:49, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. To be honest, some of your insights are pretty useful too, such as Green Bay's record on 3rd and 4th down in the game you did a summary for earlier. Or Ponder's only turnover-less game. I guess we could both do with taking some inspiration from each other, and from other sources. – Pee Jay 21:59, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Metroid II: Return of Samus

Sorry to bother you, but concerning with your edit, the "reference error" that you fixed is not a reference error. It's actually a "ref name" footnote that connects to a Dan Owsen interview (found in the third paragraph of the Development section, ref #12). Just a heads up. -- Hounder4 21:24, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Packers

I added that Rodgers threw an interception at home into the 2015 Green Bay Packers season. Thank you for adding it into the 2012 Green Bay Packers season. Go Pack Go! --74.130.133.1 (talk) 17:56, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:56, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, BillxMach. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]