User talk:Billbeee

An explanation, please read this before winging about my images

My Name is Bill Bradley, my user name here is billbeee, my user page clearly states that I have a website http://www.builderbill-diy-help.com. I also get called builderbill because of my website.All the photos and drawing on that website, about 1600 of them at last count ARE ALL MY OWN WORK. That is apart from about twenty from Wikipedia and Morguefile which all have attributions on them to the website and the image author.

I have copyright notices on the website and this has caused confusion here. They are there to deter out and out thieves from copying whole sections of my site and passing it off as their own work. Believe me this does happen! Anyone at all has only to contact me at my site for permission to use my material and I have not yet refused anyone. I have cad drawings in text books and photos in trade magazines, all freely given with no charge.

Any photos drawings and sketches that I have uploaded to Wikipedia from my site and elsewhere ARE ALL MY OWN WORK.

I made a mistake with the watermark issue. I was not aware of that rule. SORRY, I have been a naughty boy. I consider my wrist well and truly slapped.

Anyone at all has my permission to either delete them or alter them to remove the watermarks. Just leave my name as creator if they still exist.

I have some of my artworks on Wikipedia also, pen and ink sketches, watercolours etc. On some of those I may also have had the temerity to sign them in the continuance of a tradition that that been around for centuries. Go to those if you like and delete them also if you feel that putting a Signiture or name on an image is such a terrible thing. Signed. Bill, billbeee, builderbill, the owner and creator of http://www.builderbill-diy-help.com.billbeee (talk) 20:58, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Bricklayers level

Hi Bill, I really liked the sketch you did of the bricklayer's level. I have never seen that tool on a job site. It looks like an original jig. Also I liked the photo of the stanley square. It looks like it has been used on many jobs. --Johnalden^Talk 02:29, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dumpy Level Usage

Please see Talk:Dumpy level regarding your addition yesterday. AuroraD 20:18, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

re Powder Actuated Tools

Appreciate your contribtion. However, there is already an article Powder-actuated tool and they need to be merged into one article. Herostratus 05:45, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Corrugated galvanised iron

Hi Bill, the abandoned mine looks superb. Good stuff! - Gobeirne 06:28, 2 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I vote that the sheets on th etrailer pic is replaced back in the article.moza 11:20, 6 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

work in progress

Hi Bill. I've moved your page to User:Billbeee/Flooring cramp while you're working on it; we prefer to have at least a stub's worth of content before a page is put into the regular namespace. It's fine in your userspace for now though, and you can move it back when it's ready. ··coel acan 06:35, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Billbee!

I'm glad that you like what I've done with the roof article. The problem was that although it contained a great deal of valuable info, it was rated "Start class" as an article because it didn't meet wiki standards... What i did mainly was write introductions to things and tidy up info that was already contained.

We still gotta problem here! The problem is, they want info, but they want it from books. It means that everytime an expert writes about his/her own field, someone gets stuffy about it and calls it "original research". A lot of tradespeople and craftspeople with a huge amount to contribute wouldn't know where to find an article to back up a statement like slate roofs require copper nails! It's common sense, mate! so the result is, there's only one reference at the end of the article! Do you have any trade manuals that you could trot out and write in a list in the reference section?

I'm an architectural historian, and my practical experience has been to do with restoration. If you want to write an article about roof framing, I'll put it into the sort of language that they like. I think that the present article needs some info about roof framing but the description of the bolts and bracket could go elsewhere.

From my POV, I'd like an article (maybe it already exists) that show diagrams of all the different traditional systems. King post, trussed, cross braced, hammer beam, double hammer beam etc, with diagrams and photos of outstanding examples. Sydney Uni, main building, has not one but two superb hammerbeam roofs in the Great Hall and McClaren Hall.

--Amandajm 10:20, 20 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I know what you mean! It's one of the reasons it's easier to write about historic subjects. Even there, the info changes with recent schoolarship, but at least I'm not trying to kkeep up with technical changes. Thank God for Banister Fletcher! A great deal of the info contained therein has not changed much since 1898. The speed with which an efficient team can put up the frame of a house now is amazing.

I'm not suggesting you parrot someone else's words. Not a goood way to go. But there have to be texts which support you in general principal. An, yes, I agree that in a technical industry, it would be better to cite recent texts than 30 yr old ones.

With citing references, an article doesn't need inline references unless it's stating something that is likely to be challenged, or is fairly recent knowledge. If, for example, you say that a slate roof has a longer life than a galvanized steel roof, it doesn't need referencing because it's very straightfoward information, but if you say that a roof treated with aluminium and zinc has been found to have a longer life than a roof treated with zinc alone, it probably does need an inline cite, and the option is to to make a link direct to the Bluescope website, because it's what they say. If it's an academic subject, they require academic texts. But this isn't. But it does need a few more references at the bottom.

So I think I'll track down the websites of some slaters, thatchers, and shinglers, just for the look of it! --Amandajm 03:07, 21 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Missing image Image:Kakadu 2803.jpg

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:Kakadu 2803.jpg, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:Kakadu 2803.jpg is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Image:Kakadu 2803.jpg, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 22:14, 21 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Shinglres etc

I found some. Your pic is great, but on my wide browser, it stuffed up the layout. So I reduced them all, and removed Glasgow which I discovered had a licensing proble. Found a shallower pic. Did nice arrangement for colours, types etc. Hope you like it. --Amandajm 05:01, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Formwork

Hello. Please do not add size forcing information to images as you did on Formwork. WP:MOS (Wikipedia Manual of Style) will explain to you how size forcing should not to be used except in some rare situations (such as when an image is directly underneath an infobox, and the article is clearly visually improved by having the image the same width as the infobox.

If you add image size forcing to a page, you are overriding user preferences (which you can set in your preferences). If you feel that the thumbs are too big - change your own preferences, and please let others set theirs. Happy editing and Cheers, MadMaxDog 08:26, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Concrete Cover

Hello Bill, Thank you very much for adding those photographs in Concrete Cover Page.

Soffit

I just added a photo to soffit for a different angle. On your photo, how wide is the exposure or width from wall to facia? Also, is it ventilated being in northern Australia? Noles1984 17:49, 11 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Roof construction

calling for tenders... can you take a look at the talk page for Roof and the above article and make comments/suggestions? I'm intending to delete that which I have transferred. Amandajm 16:34, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Flow table test

Hi! I just wrote this article in german and translated it into english although I'm not a native speaker either a civil engineer or construction worker. I have no idea if this test also exists outside Germany... It would be grat if you took a look at it! Regards, Arne —Preceding unsigned comment added by Knipptang (talk • contribs) 02:31, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merge Floor covering, Flooring into Floor

Hi, I'm proposing (discuss) to merge Floor covering and Flooring into Floor to create what would hopefully be one reasonable article Dmcq (talk) 00:40, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cyclone Tracy

I noticed your amazing photo of Darwin in the aftermath of Cyclone Tracy. Were you in Darwin during the storm? --AStanhope (talk) 01:30, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

NowCommons: Image:Termite-mound.JPG

Image:Termite-mound.JPG is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:Image:Termite-mound-Litchfield.JPG. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[Image:Termite-mound-Litchfield.JPG]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 09:59, 10 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Image:B sqare.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.builderbill-diy-help.com/chop-saw.html. As a copyright violation, Image:B sqare.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Image:B sqare.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at [[Talk:Image:B sqare.jpg]] and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at [[Talk:Image:B sqare.jpg]] with a link to where we can find that note.
If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on [[Talk:Image:B sqare.jpg]].

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you. Wizard191 (talk) 02:42, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Image:Makita-cold-saw-catcher.JPG, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.builderbill-diy-help.com/roofing-tools.html. As a copyright violation, Image:Makita-cold-saw-catcher.JPG appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Image:Makita-cold-saw-catcher.JPG has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at [[Talk:Image:Makita-cold-saw-catcher.JPG]] and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at [[Talk:Image:Makita-cold-saw-catcher.JPG]] with a link to where we can find that note.
If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on [[Talk:Image:Makita-cold-saw-catcher.JPG]].

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you. Wizard191 (talk) 13:17, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Image:Cold Metal Cutting Saw.JPG, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.builderbill-diy-help.com/roofing-tools.html. As a copyright violation, Image:Cold Metal Cutting Saw.JPG appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Image:Cold Metal Cutting Saw.JPG has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at [[Talk:Image:Cold Metal Cutting Saw.JPG]] and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at [[Talk:Image:Cold Metal Cutting Saw.JPG]] with a link to where we can find that note.
If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on [[Talk:Image:Cold Metal Cutting Saw.JPG]].

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you. Wizard191 (talk) 13:18, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Image:Metal-cutting-blade.JPG, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.builderbill-diy-help.com/roofing-tools.html. As a copyright violation, Image:Metal-cutting-blade.JPG appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Image:Metal-cutting-blade.JPG has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at [[Talk:Image:Metal-cutting-blade.JPG]] and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at [[Talk:Image:Metal-cutting-blade.JPG]] with a link to where we can find that note.
If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on [[Talk:Image:Metal-cutting-blade.JPG]].

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you. Wizard191 (talk) 13:19, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Image:Power-Shears.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.builderbill-diy-help.com/roofing-tools.html. As a copyright violation, Image:Power-Shears.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Image:Power-Shears.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at [[Talk:Image:Power-Shears.jpg]] and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at [[Talk:Image:Power-Shears.jpg]] with a link to where we can find that note.
If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on [[Talk:Image:Power-Shears.jpg]].

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you. Wizard191 (talk) 13:25, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Image:Makita-power-nibbler.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.builderbill-diy-help.com/roofing-tools.html. As a copyright violation, Image:Makita-power-nibbler.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Image:Makita-power-nibbler.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at [[Talk:Image:Makita-power-nibbler.jpg]] and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at [[Talk:Image:Makita-power-nibbler.jpg]] with a link to where we can find that note.
If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on [[Talk:Image:Makita-power-nibbler.jpg]].

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you. Wizard191 (talk) 13:26, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding your images

Hello, Billbeee. From what I've seen, it looks like you're claiming the images you've uploaded from a website are all ones you've taken. The reason we're deleting them is because the website you're getting them from explicitly states that they are held under copyright. In order for them to be used on Wikipedia, which is a free-content site, we need you to email verification of the licenses you uploaded the images under to permissions-en-l AT lists DOT wikimedia DOT org, so that one of our OTRS volunteers can verify the license and archive your permission in our files. Once this is received, they will undelete the images and they will be available for use again. Sorry for the confusion. If you have any more questions, please feel free to leave me a note or check out WP:COPY. Thanks. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 17:18, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That should help - it may take some time to get the email filed properly, but once the OTRS volunteers see it, and verify that there are no problems, they will restore any deleted content that falls under those terms. They may have some further questions for you, so keep checking your email just in case. Best of luck. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 23:51, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Eaves-lining.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Eaves-lining.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.