User talk:Bill the bear

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bill the bear (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I don't understand why I have been blocked? I am blocked for being Bill_the_Bear, I am Bill_the_Bear. Bill_the_Bear is blocked for being Karatekid7 I am not him, Karatekid7 is not blocked, I am not him so why am I blocked?

Decline reason:

A sockpuppet is a sockpuppet, no ifs ands or buts. Make your case using Bill the Bear, not this account. --Zsinj^Talk 15:16, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Martin O'Neill

Obviously you disagree that MON's record is matched by Alex McLeish, but your personal opinion is not really relevant. If Fintry Firemen won 3 championships, 3 Scottish Cups and a League Cup, while Clachnacudden Coalmen won 2 championships, 1 SC and 3 League cups, I'm pretty sure you'd readily agree that Fintry's record was better than Clachnacudden's. However, your obvious bias hinders such objectivity when it comes to all-things Celtic.

Regarding the three revert-rule, I have reverted your edit twice in the last 24 hours, as you have. I made the same revert, this time to User:Alibabs, two days ago. The 3RR refers to changes in a 24-hour period. Camillus (talk) 00:45, 24 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

51 > 39

Bias against Rangers?

Regarding my edit of the John Spencer article - a previous editor added the details about Catholics playing for Rangers before John Spencer. I merely removed Hugh O'Neill for the simple fact that he never played for the first team. You removed all reference to Catholics playing for Celtic. I won't be reverting your edit, as I don't really care.

You are free to check my contributions to see if I have made any biased edits of any Rangers related article. Alternatively, to save you time, you might not bother, as you won't find any. In fact, what you will find is instances where I have removed anti-Rangers bias and/or vandalism. Judging from your contributions, it is clear that you are more anti-Celtic than pro-Rangers - not a single positive contribution to any Rangers-related article! Camillus (talk) 01:17, 24 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Plus you also reworded the article. Initially it had players who had signed for Rangers and were Catholic, you changed it to players who played for the first team so that you could remove one of them to suit your own agenda. Bill the bear 01:38, 24 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Which is? --McTrumpet 23:45, 28 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Recent page moves

Please take a look at Wikipedia:Naming conventions (common names) before you move any more pages. Yes, Bobby Sands was christened "Robert Sands", but he is most commonly known as "Bobby Sands", so this is the name that Wikipedia uses. Thanks. Demiurge 14:57, 27 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

3RR Warning

Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia under the three-revert rule, which states that nobody may revert an article to a previous version more than three times in 24 hours. (Note: this also means editing the page to reinsert an old edit. If the effect of your actions is to revert back, it qualifies as a revert.) Thank you.

This warning is going out to both of the users who have made the majority of the reverts to Celtic Park over the 5-star rating of the stadium. Please sort it out on the talk page before making any more edits --GraemeL ^(talk) 23:58, 27 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Some comments

Gourlg9a has put the reference to the BBC poll back into Celtic Park. Please don't remove it again without discussing it 1st. the information is relevant and verifiable. Though, you might want to add to the paragraph and say that the poll was not scientific. You can see my discussion on the matter with him on my talk page. --GraemeL ^(talk) 01:29, 28 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

On the Billy Boys edit war that may or may not be developing. Try adding some edit summaries when you make the changes. I believe that republicans, rather than Catholics, is correct in the context of the song. --GraemeL ^(talk) 01:27, 28 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Edits

I'm half inclined to revert this as I know the reason behind it. On the other hand, it was very subtle and I'm laughing too much to do it. --GraemeL ^(talk) 00:54, 4 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

OK, it was funny once. Reverting to that wording simply to annoy the other side is nothing but disruption. Please stop it now. --GraemeL ^(talk) 13:45, 4 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]