User talk:Bill Spencer5
|
Jack Crain
[edit]Hi Bill -I certainly didn't mean to offend you by rating the article a stub. I thought you did a great job gathering the information together on the Jack Crain article. A stub rating is not by any means a bad thing; it just means the article is short and could be expanded. It's also not a bad thing when someone else works on your article-the point of a wiki is that a collective group of people can make things better than a single editor could. People regularly fix my spelling mistakes and formatting errors, and, when I see an article that needs a little tweaking to meet certain guidelines that I am familiar with but the author may not be, I tend to go ahead and fix it. Karanacs 20:36, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
How do I reference a book?"
[edit]{{helpme}} I am working on the article 'Single-wing' and I am trying to use the book "Football For Coaches And Players" as a reference. I am not getting it. Thanks.Bill Spencer (talk) 15:37, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
- Hello, Bill! See Wikipedia:Citing sources/example style and you will use the template {{Cite book}}. If this does not answer your question, re-add the {{helpme}} template to your talk page. I hope this helps! Regards.--12 Noon 2¢ 16:28, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
- How do I refer to a book citation in my article. I need the number [1] in my text to pull up or point to my reference below. By the way I am trying to edit the Single-Wing article with good references, but in the mean time admins keep blistering me with tables that say that the article needs references and may not notable. Every day there seems to be a new label. Also, other editors keep adding new material that appears to be plagerized from online source. It is a mess. Sorry,....just had to vent.Bill Spencer (talk) 17:36, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
- Ah, I am sorry I misunderstood your request. For the numbered references, you want to use Wikipedia:Footnotes, which utilizes the <ref></ref> and <references /> parameters. Now, as far as the copyvio material, and the "unreferenced" templates, a new user seemed to be doing that; I have since removed said material alerted him on his talk page he should not do this. I hope this helps!--12 Noon 2¢ 18:25, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
- How do I refer to a book citation in my article. I need the number [1] in my text to pull up or point to my reference below. By the way I am trying to edit the Single-Wing article with good references, but in the mean time admins keep blistering me with tables that say that the article needs references and may not notable. Every day there seems to be a new label. Also, other editors keep adding new material that appears to be plagerized from online source. It is a mess. Sorry,....just had to vent.Bill Spencer (talk) 17:36, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
Be patient on Single-wing
[edit]I am trying to clean-up this page; however, it is going to take some time for me to get up to speed on citing references.
Image copyright problem with Image:Double-wing2.GIF
[edit]
Thank you for uploading Image:Double-wing2.GIF. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 19:12, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
- For future reference, Wikipedia's very picky about capitalization; Image:Double-wing2.gif =/ Image:Double-wing2.GIF. In any event, there aren't any apparent problems with that image; you seem to have it figured out. Sarcasticidealist (talk) 20:11, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
- Any time. Please let me know if there's ever anything else I can help you with. Sarcasticidealist (talk) 20:35, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
Looking for help to improve Single-wing formation article
[edit]Any good editing and revising is appreciated on the article Single-wing formation. --Bill Spencer (talk) 19:10, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
Image copyright problem with Image:Single-wing6.svg
[edit]Thank you for uploading Image:Single-wing6.svg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 17:16, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
Need help to revert "single-wing" article
[edit]Another editor removed all the references from the article single-wing. I am confused as to how to revert the article to recover the lost references. Thanks for your help!
I replaced the references in the article single-wing.
[edit]I think the previous author inadvertantly deleted all the citations by mistake.--Bill Spencer (talk) 11:56, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
Buck-lateral Football Play
[edit]The term buck-lateral was used almost exclusively to describe a play or a series of plays used in the Single-Wing football formation. Since the Single-Wing formation lost prominence in the 1950s, the football play referred to as the Buck-lateral is almost gone from football's vocabulary. However, prior to 1950, the buck-lateral play gave fullbacks the option to run, lateral, or hand-off the ball to another player. Running the buck-lateral required an offensive scheme that needed the fullback to possess specialized skills, as opposed to today's fullback who mainly blocks and carries the ball infrequently.
How the play got its name
[edit]Before the invention of the Single-Wing offense by Pop Warner, offenses used simple plays designed for runners to attach the defensive front behind massed line blocking. This battering ram approach usually involved the biggest runner, the fullback, as his main role was to "buck" or smash the middle of the defensive front.
The term lateral describes a short toss from one back to another that does not advance the ball. A ball that goes forward to another player is called a forward pass. The pass and the lateral are both allowed to advance the ball when the offense is operating behind their line of scrimmage. Once beyond the line of scrimmage the lateral is the only means of transfering the ball to another player.
The Buck-lateral was a play designed for single wing fullbacks to receive the toss from the center, and start toward the central part of the line to make the play look like a typical smash or buck. However, at some point the fullback would pause and do one of several options, including lateraling the ball to another back.
Warner's Carlisle formation, or Single-Wing, added additional misdirection and trickery to allow for runners to gain yards by deceiving the defense. The Single-wing also allowed the offense to put more blockers at the point of attack than the defense could muster.
Plays used with the Buck-lateral
[edit]File:Singlewingformation3.PNG listed for deletion
[edit]An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Singlewingformation3.PNG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 00:47, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:34, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
File permission problem with File:Crain playbook.JPG
[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:Crain playbook.JPG. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.
If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
- make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
- Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.
If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
ATTENTION: This is an automated, BOT-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate your file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 03:00, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
The file File:Melonfootball Regularfootball.JPG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
unused, low-res, no obvious use
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 21 January 2020 (UTC)
The file File:Singlewingiconformation2.JPG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
unused, low-res, no obvious use
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
The file File:Singlewingiconformation2.PNG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
unused, low-res, no obvious use
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of File:Double-wing2.GIF
[edit]
A tag has been placed on File:Double-wing2.GIF requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused duplicate or lower-quality copy of another file on Wikipedia having the same file format, and all inward links have been updated.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Pkbwcgs (talk) 21:02, 6 August 2021 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of File:Singlewing formation vs3.gif
[edit]
A tag has been placed on File:Singlewing formation vs3.gif requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused duplicate or lower-quality copy of another file on Wikipedia having the same file format, and all inward links have been updated.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Pkbwcgs (talk) 21:13, 6 August 2021 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of File:Singlewingformation vs5.svg
[edit]
A tag has been placed on File:Singlewingformation vs5.svg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Pkbwcgs (talk) 21:13, 6 August 2021 (UTC)
