User talk:Bill Chadwell

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bill Chadwell (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have always edited strictly according to Wikipedia's guidelines and I have never been blocked before. Please explain.

Decline reason:

The blocking admin has confirmed that this is a checkuser-based block. — Sandstein 22:33, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Have you ever operated another user account? If yes, which one(s)? Sandstein 14:59, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No, I have not. --Bill Chadwell (talk) 15:43, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stand by as I contact the blocking admin. Sandstein 15:57, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bill Chadwell (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I use a popular dialup ISP (VTISP) with dynamic IP numbers. If checkuser finds that someone else uses that service to edit Wikipedia, that does not mean that I am the same person. Since I have no history of breaking the rules here, I think that some sort of more substantial evidence is appropriate if I am to be blccked.

Decline reason:

That evidence happens to be a CheckUser. — Tiptoety ^talk 23:28, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

It would seem more than a little odd that two users of the same small dialup provider are making the exact same edits. It may be a better idea to simply request an unblock on your original account and address the behavior that got you blocked in the first place. Kuru ^talk 23:40, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]