User talk:Bigwhisker

Steve Timmons

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate your contributions to the Steve Timmons article, but we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. Perhaps you would like to rewrite the article in your own words. For more information, take a look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Happy editing! —Caesura ^(t) 20:12, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Copyvio

Please do not add copyrighted images to an article, such as you did to Kelis, without providing the mandatory detailed fair-use rationale as indicated by the license. Thanks. --Yamla 17:34, 3 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Flo Dsport.jpg)

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Flo Dsport.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image can be used under a fair use license. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Yamla 17:41, 3 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image problems

Magazine covers may only be used to illustrate and provide critical commentary on that particular issue of the magazine. They may not be used solely to depict the person on the cover. Additionally, all copyrighted images require a detailed fair-use rationale for each use of the image. Please refrain from uploading any more images until you have gone back and fixed the ones you have already uploaded. Thanks. --Yamla 17:41, 3 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked for 24 hours for continuing to violate Wikipedia copyright and fair-use policies. Please refrain from uploading any further images until you have resolved the substantial problems with the images you have already uploaded. --Yamla 20:35, 6 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm trying to delete these files but I don't see how. Please advise.

Go to the image page and add {{db-author|Delete reason here}} and they'll be deleted shortly. --Yamla 23:23, 7 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Torrie_MuscleMag.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Torrie_MuscleMag.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:25, 11 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems with Image:TilaN.jpg

An image that you uploaded, Image:TilaN.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Copyright problems because it is a suspected copyright violation. Please look there if you know that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), and then provide the necessary information there and on its page, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

You have been blocked for one month, as stated in the blocking policy for copyright violations. To contest this block, add the text {{unblock|reason}} on this page, replacing "reason" with an explanation of why you believe this block should be reversed. An administrator will look over your reason and act accordingly.

Please do not erase warnings on this page. Doing so is considered vandalism. LBMixPro ^<Sp ^e ^ak|^o ^n|it!> 22:28, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Kim Loan

I actually think your changes make the article less workable. Instead of it being "what she says", these not-yet-verified things are written as fact... - BalthCat 23:06, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:EriMoriyama.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:EriMoriyama.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Yamla 16:48, 27 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:KellyHu Unleashed.jpg)

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:KellyHu Unleashed.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image is unlicensed for use on Wikipedia and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful.

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Fred-Chess 09:02, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Images for the Commons

Hey Man! A greeting!, Well i think You'd should to upload your images to wikicommons such as Francine Dee, Thuy Sema, Brenda Grace and others hot import girls for their respective articles in others languages. Greetings and all my support Man!___Kamui99 07:23, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:ABeard FHM.jpeg)

Thanks for uploading Image:ABeard FHM.jpeg. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image is unlicensed for use on Wikipedia and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful.

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. feydey 14:02, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Copyvio

The article on Jennifer Garner already has a fair-use image. Additionally, the new ones you uploaded do not have a detailed fair-use rationale for their use. --Yamla 23:57, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Roger that! --Bigwhisker

Also note that a recent change is that we may not use copyrighted images at all if it is possible to take a free image. So, for example, a promotional image of a person, even with a fair-use rationale, may not be used if the person is still alive and so could be photographed. Now, this is a new change and I don't have a citation for you. It had nothing to do with me and I am not enforcing this yet, but just keeping you in the loop. --Yamla 00:09, 18 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Roger, Roger! I'll not be worrying with photos any more. --Bigwhisker

Image copyright problem with Image:BrendaSong.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:BrendaSong.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:06, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Kim Loan, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. —P ilotguy (ptt) 18:12, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Ktso.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Ktso.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 13:49, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems with Image:SeRiPak02.jpg

An image that you uploaded, Image:SeRiPak02.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Copyright problems because it is a suspected copyright violation. Please look there if you know that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), and then provide the necessary information there and on its page, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Dudesleeper · Talk 14:34, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

- Dudesleeper · Talk 14:34, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:AmericanPiePromo.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:AmericanPiePromo.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 15:09, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Same for Image:StargateAtlantis01.jpg. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 15:12, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

October 2007

Hello. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary, which wasn't included with your recent edit to Craig Biggio. Thank you. MBK004 11:43, 6 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:ReeseWitherspoon.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:ReeseWitherspoon.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 02:03, 1 November 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

The "Source" field is self referential. Wikipedia can not be a source of itself. Also, the date field is blank.

Arx Fortis 02:03, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Merv Griffin's Crosswords

While I tend to agree with the statements you added to this article, the fact of the matter is that these are mere personal opinions, and have no sources cited to back them up. Therefore, they don't belong in an encyclopedic article. If you can find a reliable source that mentions these concerns, please cite them. Otherwse they're nothing more than your (and also my) opinion. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 22:54, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:AnaIvanovic 2007USOpen (August31).jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:AnaIvanovic 2007USOpen (August31).jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 09:19, 18 January 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. 98.204.112.111 (talk) 09:19, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:NicoleVaidesova 2007USOpen.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:NicoleVaidesova 2007USOpen.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 09:19, 18 January 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. 98.204.112.111 (talk) 09:19, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Sharapove And Roddick.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Sharapove And Roddick.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 09:19, 18 January 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. 98.204.112.111 (talk) 09:19, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:MWie02.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:MWie02.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 09:19, 18 January 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. 98.204.112.111 (talk) 09:19, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Sharapove And Roddick.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). As a copyright violation, Sharapove And Roddick.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Sharapove And Roddick.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Sharapove And Roddick.jpg and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Sharapove And Roddick.jpg with a link to where we can find that note.
If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Sharapove And Roddick.jpg.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you. dave pape (talk) 16:09, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

Despite numerous warnings and prior blocks, you have continued to violate copyright. As you are directly and deliberately placing Wikipedia in legal jeopardy, you have now been blocked indefinitely. --Yamla (talk) 21:34, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:SashaSingleton.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:SashaSingleton.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 02:29, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:Brandy_Grace.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Brandy_Grace.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 02:30, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:Thuy_sema.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Thuy_sema.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 02:31, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Image:Francine dee.jpg

A tag has been placed on Image:Francine dee.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I8 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is available as a bit-for-bit identical copy on the Wikimedia Commons under the same name, or all references to the image on Wikipedia have been updated to point to the title used at Commons.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Image:Francine dee.jpg|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Sdrtirs (talk) 19:04, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:SashaSingleton.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:SashaSingleton.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Kelly ^hi! 06:12, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Brandy_Grace.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Brandy_Grace.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Kelly ^hi! 06:12, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Thuy_sema.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Thuy_sema.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Kelly ^hi! 06:13, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:MWie01.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:MWie01.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Kelly ^hi! 06:16, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:LianneLin01.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:LianneLin01.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Kelly ^hi! 06:21, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:NatalieKeen.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:NatalieKeen.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Kelly ^hi! 06:22, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Marianela Pereyra

The article Marianela Pereyra has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Only primary or trivial sources

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:04, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Marianela Pereyra

The article Marianela Pereyra has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable; check the history (and the comment by User:BoyTheKingCanDance on the talk page) for how bad this once was.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Drmies (talk) 18:50, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]