User talk:Biggie313

A tag has been placed on Hackers hangout, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from articles. If you do not believe the article deserves to be deleted, then please do the following:

Place {{hangon}} on the page. Please do not remove any existing speedy deletion tag(s).
Make your case on the article's talk page.

Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. Fan-1967 03:33, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Acura RSX

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles. If you continue to do so, it may be considered vandalism. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Recury 18:13, 29 January 2007 (UTC) This is your last warning. The next time you vandalise Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Recury 18:26, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:XF111.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:XF111.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 19:12, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image and text contributions to recirculating ball

Hi, your images and some of the text you recently added to recirculating ball appear to be copyrighted by http://www.howstuffworks.com/. Thanks for attempting to improve Wikipedia, but please don't add copyright material. You can create your own content and cite the relevant material as a reference or an external link. – Kieran T ^(talk) 14:16, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

File:XF111.JPG listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:XF111.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Bility (talk) 23:04, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]