Jump to content

User talk:Biggfoot23

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Disruptive edits

[edit]

Hello Biggfoot23! Please refrain from making changes to any further article like you did in The Circle (American season 1) and The Circle (American season 2) without discussion or any apparent reason. 2601:348:300:3CD0:3D03:6E20:5103:D0EA (talk)

Biggfoot23, you are invited to the Teahouse!

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hi Biggfoot23! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like TheAafi (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
Notice

The article Vettri has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable future film, fails WP:NFF as production wasn't notable. Should be deleted or moved to draft until release and then notability can be determined.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Donaldd23 (talk) 11:38, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Vettri for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Vettri is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vettri until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Donaldd23 (talk) 17:48, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article Dharsha Gupta has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NACTOR

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. 2600:6C58:4B7F:6084:A900:12DD:9976:A459 (talk) 19:39, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article Kaavya Arivumani has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NACTOR

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. 2600:6C58:4B7F:6084:A900:12DD:9976:A459 (talk) 20:02, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Dharsha Gupta for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dharsha Gupta is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dharsha Gupta until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

2600:6C58:4B7F:6084:1994:1790:4070:5EB8 (talk) 03:57, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Dharsha Gupta for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dharsha Gupta is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dharsha Gupta until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

2600:6C58:4B7F:6084:1994:1790:4070:5EB8 (talk) 22:20, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kaavya Arivumani for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kaavya Arivumani is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kaavya Arivumani until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

2600:6C58:4B7F:6084:1994:1790:4070:5EB8 (talk) 00:35, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

[edit]
Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Romil.Choudary per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Romil.Choudary. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 01:44, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]