User talk:Bigbrojd

June 2016

Hello, I'm Kaobear. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Alan Knill has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Kaobear (talk) 22:11, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

September 2016

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to WrestleMania 32, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Creativity-II (talk) 11:19, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of IGWC Slammy Awards

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on IGWC Slammy Awards requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. GILO A&E⇑ 22:04, 25 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It was not deleted "due to the fact that the person putting it up for 'speedy deletion' thought it was not genuine", it was deleted on A7 grounds for having no credible claim of significance. When the significance of the material in the article is established, then it will need to meet notability standards, and when that happens the article can stay. Until then, though, the article has no anchor to drop in Wikipedia waters. TomStar81 (Talk) 23:57, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Frantic Assembly for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Frantic Assembly is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frantic Assembly until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Domdeparis (talk) 12:36, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edit to Barton Peveril Sixth Form College

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Barton Peveril Sixth Form College, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 11:12, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Daily DDT

Please note that the Daily DDT is not a reliable source so please do not use it as a reference as you did for the claim that Al Roker is a guest ring announcer for the mixed tag. 101.182.14.91 (talk) 23:25, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Joshua Dodd

Hello Bigbrojd,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Joshua Dodd for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

^{Babymissfortune} 13:10, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The notability guidelines for people can be found at Wikipedia:Notability (people). Please add as references any articles about Joshua Dodd that have appeared in in reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject. See Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 17:32, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Voice FM 103.9

Hello Bigbrojd,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Voice FM 103.9 for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons. For more details please see the notice on the article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

^{Babymissfortune} 13:16, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

November 2018

Hello. Your recent edit to Barton Peveril Sixth Form College appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. Gab4gab (talk) 19:21, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited British Academy Children's Awards, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Something Special (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:13, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

January 2019

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Eurovision Song Contest 2019. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. —Dimsar01 ^Talk ⌚→ 20:00, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Joshua Dodd (presenter)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Joshua Dodd (presenter) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:54, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]