User talk:Big Virgil

April 2020

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Susanne Kuehling, from its old location at User:Big Virgil/sandbox. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. Sulfurboy (talk) 16:20, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Susanne Kuehling moved to draftspace

Per the message in response on my talk page, this fails WP:PROF. Since you improperly created a mainspace article instead of moving in the draft, I've had to create a duplicate page for the draft. Please edit Draft:Susanne Kuehling and not Draft:Susanne Kuehling2. I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline or WP:PROF and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Sulfurboy (talk) 16:35, 20 April 2020 (UTC) Sulfurboy (talk) 16:35, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Susanne Kuehling2 has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Susanne Kuehling2. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 19:48, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Susanne Kuehling has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Susanne Kuehling. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 19:49, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Susanne Kuehling (April 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This is one of two identical drafts on Susanne Kuehling. You put the other copy in article space without review, where it was moved to draft space by User:Sulfurboy, who noted that it was undersourced and should be incubated. Since that resulted in two identical drafts, I tagged the other one for deletion. I am declining this draft to allow you to work on it. It appears that Kuehling almost certainly satisfies academic notability, but I agree that better sources are needed. Four of the references appear to be four reviews of Kuehling's book. I have not read the other three in detail. Please rework. If you have questions, you may discuss before resubmitting.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Susanne Kuehling and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Susanne Kuehling, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 20:04, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Big Virgil! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 20:04, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Susanne Kuehling has been accepted

Susanne Kuehling, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

— Sagotreespirit (^talk) 13:26, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Susanne Kuehling

Good work on Susanne Kuehling. The other reviewers don't know much about Papuan anthropology, but I specialize in Melanesian studies and know that Susanne Kuehling is clearly notable. Thanks for your contributions. — Sagotreespirit (^talk) 13:27, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I did not know that there is a Project on Papua-New Guinea. -Big Virgil (talk) 15:11, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]