Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute in which you may have been involved. Content disputes can hold up article development, therefore we are requesting your participation to help find a resolution. The thread is "Merseyrail, Tyne and Wear Metro".
Guide for participants
If you wish to open a DR/N filing, click the "Request dispute resolution" button below this guide or go to Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard/request for an easy to follow, step by step request form.
What this noticeboard is:
It is an early step to resolve content disputes after talk page discussions have stalled. If it's something we can't help you with, or is too complex to resolve here, our volunteers will point you in the right direction.
What this noticeboard is not:
It is not a place to deal with the behavior of other editors. We deal with disputes about article content, not disputes about user conduct.
It is not a substitute for the talk pages: the dispute must have been discussed extensively on a talk page (not just through edit summaries) before resorting to DRN.
It is not a court with judges or arbitrators that issue binding decisions: we focus on resolving disputes through consensus, compromise, and explanation of policy.
Things to remember:
Discussions should be civil, calm, concise, neutral, and objective. Comment only about the article's content, not the other editors. Participants who go off-topic or become uncivil may be asked to leave the discussion.
Let the other editors know about the discussion by posting {{subst:drn-notice}} on their user talk page.
If you ever need any help, ask one of our volunteers, who will help you as best as they can. You may also wish to read through the FAQ page located here and on the DR/N talkpage.
The mods here have semi-banned me saying I am someone else, which is nonsense, with no proof of this ridiculous allegation. They say a I am suspected of being another user, but not allowed to contribute to this kangaroo court. This all comes from the talk pages where editors were writing untruths and just plain bad writing. As the points given by myself and others were sound the detractors as last resort started to character assassinate saying I have multiple identities, was someone else etc. The mods naively sucked this in. I see the Tyne and Wear article still has the untruths in that T&W is the second biggest rapid-transit network in the country - this is pure nonsense and a lie. Yet the mods said that they will investigate and have done NOTHING. The one and only BigScribe (talk) 10:01, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
This waterspace investigation is bordering on childishness. This Liv3rp00l man is not that bright, he constantly vandalizes sites. I would ban him for a few months until he gets the message. I am Big Scribe and only Big Scribe. GET THAT FIRMLY IN YOUR HEADS. Why am I not allowed to contribute if it about me? A kangaroo court indeed. The one and only BigScribe (talk) 10:02, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
