User talk:BigBoyzz1006

December 2020

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that in this edit to Bryan Scott (quarterback), you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 16:24, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Bryan Scott (quarterback), you may be blocked from editing. Eagles 24/7 (C) 20:12, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

January 2021

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Eagles 24/7 (C) 22:19, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

BigBoyzz1006 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Sorry about this! But There is inaccurate information about this player with his association to the Canadian Football League and National Football League. I would like to explain and speak with someone about this. Please advise me how I can become unblocked. Thank you. And again so sorry for this!! BigBoyzz1006 (talk) 01:12, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Procedural decline as you can have only one open unblock request at a time and the other one has more to do with why you've been blocked. — Daniel Case (talk) 07:03, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Blocked for sockpuppetry

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/BigBoyzz1006. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 22:42, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

BigBoyzz1006 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The separate accounts were a mistake. I had forgotten my password and so instead I just made a new one. Did not realize you could reset password- as Wikipedia is such a professional site. Sorry about that! I wanted to make changes to this page because some of this information is false. There is inaccurate information about this player with his association to the Canadian Football League and National Football League. Please advise me how I can become unblocked. I would also like to speak with someone about how these changes can be made. Thank you. And again sorry for this!BigBoyzz1006 (talk) 00:58, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I'm a checkuser, which means I can see data from our system logs. I can see when you log in, and when you reset your password.

There were no failed login attempts prior to the creation of the Thehulk2021 account. There were failed login attempts later that day (>12hrs), and a password reset later that day.

It looks to me like you switched back and forth between the accounts. And the unblock request does not explain the third account. SQL ^{Query me!} 00:33, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@Daniel Case: Hi there, I am sorry to ask - but how can I be unblocked or communicate with someone my concerns? I very much enjoy Wikipedia and never meant any harm. Would just like to understand how to go about all of this. Thank you BigBoyzz1006 (talk) 14:19, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I think the first thing you need to do is understand why your edits were problematic in the first place. Drmies (talk) 00:36, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]