User talk:Biaswarrior

STOP removing the PROD tags from articles. This is NOT a violation of WP:Before. Wuhwuzdat (talk) 19:09, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Biaswarrior! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Them From Space 19:21, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: edit a page • upload and use images Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
Getting help
Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and guidelines
Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The community
Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Writing articles
Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Pages needing attention • Peer review
Miscellaneous
User name • User pages • Talk pages Clean up: General • Spam • Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Point

Please also read Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point, as well as WP:BATTLE. Try to contribute constructively based on the merits of an individual article, not the procedure used in nominating it for deletion. Them From Space 19:22, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Copied from WP:ANI - I note that you have been removing PROD's and !voting "Keep" at AfD's at a rate of several per minute. This suggests to me that you have not looked at the rationale for either the PROD or the AfD and are making WP:POINTy edits in referring to WP:BEFORE - this is disruptive. If you do not cease you are liable to be blocked for the disruption to the encyclopedia. For the sake of clarity, this is an official level3 warning - continue and you will be blocked from editing the encyclopedia. LessHeard vanU (talk) 19:37, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked indefinitely

Checkuser confirmed sock of User:POVbattler and User:Biasprotector. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 19:48, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Biaswarrior (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm in a school library. Of course some people are going to have the same IP address.

Decline reason:

The point Jdelanoy is trying to make below is that Checkuser looks at a good deal more than just your IP address; it is capable of distinguishing between two systems on the same internet connection, which was not the case here. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 23:36, 8 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Read mw:Extension:Checkuser. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 23:34, 8 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Iadmitmybiaswhycantyou? for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. Hell In A Bucket (talk) 14:42, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]