User talk:Bhuvannalla

hai can i have ur details!!

January 2014

Hello, I'm Malik Shabazz. I wanted to let you know that I removed one or more external links you added to the page Pension, because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 19:23, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

List of Highest grossing Indian films

Please put your comment supporting telugu language. here

Marchoctober (talk) 08:22, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I started a discussion at ANI. The talk page won't work so we need to get Ricky banned and then we can fix all that Tamil nonsense. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 166.171.122.101 (talk) 07:34, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 12:59, 2 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 04:46, 9 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disruption at List of highest-grossing Indian films

These two edits were disruptive since you are clearly aware that their is an ongoing RFC on that topic. If you (or others) continue in this vein, I will need to issue blocks or topic bans, since the only other way to deal with such disruption/edit-warring is to fully-protect the article, which prevent even non-controversial improvement from being made. So please don't repeat such edits till the RFC is closed and the issue decided. Abecedare (talk) 19:14, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Stop removing reliably sourced content that is under discussion on the talk page. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 19:23, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Arbitration discretionary sanctions alert

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Abecedare (talk) 19:17, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Bhuvannalla, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Kailash29792 (talk) 07:06, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

August 2015

You have been blocked from editing for a period of two weeks for sock puppetry. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 07:42, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Bhuvannalla. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Edit-warring

Just like I admonished Plutonium at Talk:List of highest-grossing Indian films, your edit here I absolutely consider edit-warring. There's no harm in leaving the other version until the discussion is resolved. One of you has to demonstrate some adult behavior here, and divorcing yourself of whatever emotional attachment you have to the wording is crucial here. Plutonium at least had the courtesy to open a discussion, which you should/could have done as well. To say that there's nothing to discuss suggests to me that you don't care about the outcome. If you don't, leave Plutonium's change alone. Or, if you do care, (and it seems you do), please participate in civil discussion and arrive at a solution or compromise. The edit-warring needs to stop and you're about a freckle away from being blocked for it. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 19:21, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of most expensive Indian films, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Telugu. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:11, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Discuss on Talk page if you have any view other than established norm on Wikipedia

The dubbed version collection is included in that language category. First get boxoffice knowledge otherwise you will be blocked for edit warring--Rashkeqamar (talk) 10:56, 4 May 2017 (UTC) There is no need of giving explanation. I follow what Wikipedia follows.[reply]

stop it

in terms of films produced yearly

this is the break down provided by CBFC india for films released in 2016

Hindi 340 (digital) and 0 (celluloid), total of 340 Tamil 291 (digital) and 0 (celluloid), total of 291 Telugu 275 (digital) and 0 (celluloid), total of 275

please stop writing after hindi film industry for 100000 times.Uthprerakam (talk) 07:22, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Size of the film industry does not depend only on the number of films released every year. The numbers change every year. Sometimes, Telugu industry will produce maximum numbers, sometimes Tamil and sometimes Hindi. It is one of the factor to determine the size. The revenues in terms of gross and share, number of screens, global reach, etc will determine the size of an industry. If someone accepts or not, Hindi film industry is at top position followed by Telugu. So, there is nothing wrong with the wordings I have mentioned in the article.

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Bhuvannalla. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Bhuvannalla. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

August 2019

Hello, I'm Fylindfotberserk. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Saaho seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Open up a discussion at WP:ICTF. As far as I know, one was opened up but no consensus has been reached Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Film/Indian_cinema_task_force/Archive_5#How_to_order_languages_in_infoboxes_and_elsewhere Fylindfotberserk (talk) 12:36, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Saaho shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Csgir (talk) 12:37, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Can't you follow simple WP:BRD? - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 12:37, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for edit warring, as you did at Saaho. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. – bradv🍁 15:46, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:09, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

May 2022

Hello, I'm Dr.Pinsky. I noticed that you recently removed content from Sundhi without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Dr.Pinsky (talk) 14:44, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Soundik

Hi I guess you are right about soundik as they are selling them as Dalit .

I edited the page 4 time but Pinsky always keep on mentioning it as Dalit . How to resolve this ? JockerEdit (talk) 19:55, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

He have to stick to the fact and we have to remove the word Dalit but Pinsky is accepting the same JockerEdit (talk) 20:21, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I am sry you may found lot of typo as i am typing from my cell.

I guess you know how to edit in wiki we have to correct Pinsky and remove the word Dalit from soundik JockerEdit (talk) 20:22, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Also ekdalian is not a judge who pronounced the verdict JockerEdit (talk) 12:34, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Bhuvannalla

@JockerEdit

Hey! I'm with you guys... we've to do something. As it is misleading people's. Let's come together Raj Hanse (talk) 18:35, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:31, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:26, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your changes were not reflecting properly

Hi, I have reverted your changes because your edit removed complete list from the first section “Highest-grossing films” in [1]. PRIYAMANI7 (talk) 18:09, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]