User talk:Bhlegkorbh

Talk page discussions at Germanic neopaganism

Hi Bhlegkorbh. I see that for many years you have been active over at the talk page for Germanic neopaganism. There are a number of discussions being held at that article's talk page at the moment, regarding both a potential change to the title and regarding whether certain paragraphs should be included or not. If you had the time, your input on those issues (regardless of whether you support my own positions or completely oppose them) would be useful and gratefully received. Best, Midnightblueowl (talk) 22:19, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:30, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Help needed on Germanic Neopaganism

(in reply to a message you left me years ago) Sorry; at that time, I was considering giving up on Wikipedia. I still don't edit much, though I did today for a while, I'll be going back to being not very active. Did that article ever improve how you wanted? I don't agree with the redirect to Heathenry, because technically, it could include some things like pagan German Idealist modern philosophy that some of it might be atheist or pantheist, etc.--dchmelik (t|c) 07:09, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Fallfest for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Fallfest is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fallfest until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bearcat (talk) 23:21, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

"Balder Rising" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Balder Rising and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 September 21#Balder Rising until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Paradoctor (talk) 12:26, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Vrilology" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Vrilology and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 September 21#Vrilology until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Paradoctor (talk) 12:29, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]