User talk:Bhetki

Cookies as Promised

ERMlibrarian (talk) 04:55, 19 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Institute of communications research (November 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by The Mirror Cracked were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Bhetki/Institute of communications research and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Bhetki/Institute of communications research, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

The Mirror Cracked (talk) 02:22, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Bhetki! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! The Mirror Cracked (talk) 02:22, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your user page is probably okay

Sorry, on a second look I don't think you have to change anything on your user page if you don't want to. It's not quite the Wikipedia norm, but it doesn't seem to violate any policy to ask for help on an article you're trying to develop. Providing a pointer to the page while it's under development in either your userspace or in draftspace would be a useful thing to do, but most experienced editors can find it via your list of contributions. — jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 04:48, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User:Bhetki/Institute of communications research

Hello, Bhetki. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, User:Bhetki/Institute of communications research.

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. — JJMC89 (T·C) 04:29, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]