User talk:Bhamv
Welcome
[edit]
|
Hello!!!!!
[edit]I was thinknig if we can become friends? TheBlazikenMaster 18:32, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
- 'No' would be fine, at least answer the question. TheBlazikenMaster 02:23, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
- Nevermind, since you didn't reply I no longer know why I wanted to become your friend in the first place. TheBlazikenMaster 15:34, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
- 'No' would be fine, at least answer the question. TheBlazikenMaster 02:23, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
Sure, I'll just let the general stat descriptions stay then. (But I'm gonna keep deleting people being told exact movesets to learn >>)—ウルタプ 16:41, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
lol i cant believe it myself... i still dont know what im doing lol.. but thank you for doing that... : )
Metagross
[edit]It's definitly true(I read it in a guide). Steven's Metagross is weaker to water than fire(I've battled him 4 times). Everything that the Pokemon Collaborative Project seeks need not be written on stone. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Vikrant Phadkay (talk • contribs) 04:00, 1 February 2007 (UTC).
- I have stated in the previous para that I've battled Metagross. So, of course, the citation is Pokemon Sapphire; What else is needed(Sorry, I am not being able to relocate the guide). But if you play Sapphire and manage to catch a Kyogre, you'll notice that its Hydro Pump can wash Metagross. And a citation doesn't have material restrictions!
- I have written all this here because you have blown away several important facts about Pokemon battling, while ensuring that Wikipedia does not become a game guide. Please modify the written matter or talk to its contributor before erasing it if it gets to technical for Wikipedia.
- Don't ever underestimb. And please talk in a decent tone. Attacks, abuses etc might cause you to get blocked from editing Wikipedia —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Vikrant Phadkay (talk • contribs) 05:37, 1 February 2007 (UTC).
- You're truly a Pokemon Master. Metagross and the Pokemon League are yours. I'm not interested in arguing anymore.
- But please look at that line once more:"If you don't want your writing to be edited mercilessly or redistributed by others, do not submit it." This line does not permit others to ERASE entire paragraphs just because they contain some game guides. They may be having some or the other special facts —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Vikrant Phadkay (talk • contribs) 06:36, 1 February 2007 (UTC).
- Still here's a citation(I just found it!):http://guides.ign.com/guides/496231/page_14.html
The citation has these lines too: Face Skarmory with Fire ot Electric, Aggron with Ground (Earthquake) and everyone else with Water. Swapert is a useful ally here. Use Surf and Muddy Water attacks liberally.!! -Vikrant
Metagross
[edit]This is what you saw:
- 1. Use Fire against Metagross
- 2. Use Fire or Electric against Skarmory
- 3. Use Ground against Aggron
- 4. Use Water against everybody else
- 5. Swampert is useful here (I assume because he gets both Ground and Water attacks)
- 6. Surf and Muddy Water are good attacks to use.
And here's the true paragraph: The Pokémon Champion is none other than Steven, whom you've crossed paths with several times on your journey. Steven fields a team of super-strong Pokémon, but they are not invincible. Just make sure you keep switching Types, and don't get caught with a wrong-Type on the field. Don't get greedy. If you don't match up well, Steven will make you pay.
Since Steel is all melty, bring a strong Fire Type. Those playing Ruby might want to think about Groudon. If you selected a Torchic, the leveled-up Combusken will also be a superstar in this fight, especially because it has strong Fighting-Type moves. Face Skarmory with Fire ot Electric, Aggron with Ground (Earthquake) and everyone else with Water. Swapert is a useful ally here. Use Surf and Muddy Water attacks liberally, and don't be afraid to use all the Items you brought. This is what you're here for! Rock and roll.
Now, where is the statement you added in the talk, that Use Fire against Metagross?. I can't even see a capital M, forget Metagross.
So, I make conclusions (only one of these is correct!):
- I have a sight problem; or
- I beg your pardon but your web connection may be hi-tech that you see hidden words; or
- Someone is(most incredibly) messing with Bhamv's account and sending me all rubbish! or
- (Why not, most probably) you are adamant about Metagross and dont want to learn anything new!
Milotic
[edit]Seriously, you won't battle even one Milotic outside the Battle tower other than Wallace's. Either play the game, or check the entire walkthrough that I have been talking of, in the Metagross tussle
Re: Hero/Protagonist talk page precedent
[edit]Yeah, that'll work. The only reason I reverted the edit back to hero/heroine in the first place was because Kariteh said "A consensus hasn't been reached on the talk page" in the edit summary, and when there was no active discussion about using hero/heroine on the talk page for the particular article in question (I did check, just to make sure), and he didn't refer to any other article talk pages, it didn't quite make sense to me. I can definitely see how hero would be considered POV, though. Thanks! ^^ Nique talk 11:49, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
Kirlia
[edit]Luigifan is trying to add the trivia bit again. -Sukecchi 19:49, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- You got it. :o -Sukecchi 11:56, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
This notice is to inform you that because many people have added their names to Wikipedia:WikiProject Pokémon#Participants but do not seem to be active, all names are being deleted in an effort to find out who is still truly interested in the project. All you have to do is re-add your name if you'd still like to be considered a member of WP:POKE. Any questions, you can contact me on my talk page. -ΖαππερΝαππερ BabelAlexandria 17:34, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
Barnstar
[edit]
|
The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar | |
| You're a great contributer to wikipedia and i feel at lot of people forget about you even though you are gret, welldone , keep up the good work Mr.whiskers (talk) 19:22, 21 November 2007 (UTC) |
- Oooo, thanks! Bhamv (talk) 03:41, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
Hi !!! :)
[edit]
Ichliebezuko (talk) has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Ichliebezuko (talk) 16:49, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
88.248.17.92
[edit]88.248.17.92 is still screwing with American football positions. Does a lowly peon like me have the power to block, or does it have to be an admin (or a person of sufficient power, such as perhaps you are)? ΨνPsinu 15:09, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
- I reported him to WP:AIV and he's been blocked now. Bhamv (talk) 15:40, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
- Good work! Thanks... ΨνPsinu 16:23, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
I am sorry if you feel that my observations of fact have been "snide", have you been to the dictionary? But to the point, Squall being a hero is confirmed even by the creator Tetsuya Nomura. Moreover, you seem to have nothing else to contribute to the discussion about Squall than your comments about snideness of other people. Please comment only if you have something worthwhile to say.
Sigh. "who's been trying to hide their edits and who hasnt..." please provide supportive evidence for these secret edits which have been hidden. A link will do.
"personally, I feel that..." luckily, this encyclopedia isn't a subject to your personal feelings, for it would be no more.
"creator of a game or another creative work does not..." No, of course not. But that doesn't mean their honest opinion should be left unheard.
All in all, what exactly are you trying to accomplish here, attacking me? Your userpage says you are here to build an encyclopedia, but your actions prove otherwise.
Squall Leonhart
[edit]Hi. I've removed portuguese link from Squall Leonhart because the page is about a list of character of FFVII FFVIII, it's not Squall Leonhart page in portuguese. --Zack Tartufo (talk) 18:57, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
- I assume you mean FFVIII there, and you accidentally made a typo. Regardless, the link to the Squall Leonhart section of the Portuguese page is still useful. There are many other examples around Wikipedia of an article linking to a section of another article in another language, so this isn't a unique situation. I believe it would be better if the link stays.
- Thanks.Bhamv (talk) 02:36, 1 May 2012 (UTC)
- Yes, I mean FFVIII, my mistake. Then ok, let's keep that. --Zack Tartufo (talk) 10:49, 1 May 2012 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:08, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]
Hello, Bhamv. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Bhamv. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Bhamv. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |