User talk:BeyondObvious47

Dear NawlinsWiki,

I guess this is my first and last experience with your group as I see I have been blocked. I am shocked that because someone holds a differing view from the "popular consensus" that it precludes them from editing. I have been researching the topic of the Keanes and found the existing information very inaccurate and that it omits a very key point that I had learned about and wanted to share. That is why I included the link to support my edit. I also have never been accused of being a "sockpuppet" as you say linking me to someone else's account.I do not appreciate being unfairly banned or falsely accused.

The legal source I used:

(...overturned in 1990 and the 4 million dollars charge vacated in a different court in SanFrancisco appelate court by 3 other judges.) <http://openjurist.org/893/f2d/1338/keane-v-keane-usaref>

Sincerely, BeyondObvious47 BeyondObvious47 (talk) 00:54, 25 January 2015 (UTC) (whatever that's about)