User talk:Bexsi

May 2018

Hello, I'm Velella. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added to Catherine Howard ‎ have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you. Velella ^{Velella Talk} 18:49, 9 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you insert a spam link, as you did at Anne Neville. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. Favonian (talk) 18:55, 9 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Widr (talk) 20:26, 9 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bexsi (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here There is no reason for you to block me, I have added pages with a lot of information on that particular person. It is not any sort of spam or self promotion. Just take a look and get back to me

Decline reason:

Every single one of your edits included a link to your website or your Youtube channel. We call that conflict of interest spamming and don't allow it. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 21:03, 9 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Bexsi (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #21476 was submitted on May 09, 2018 21:09:47. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 21:09, 9 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]