User talk:Bewat

The identity of this user account has been verified by the Volunteer Response Team. Full documentation is available to trusted volunteers. If you are an English Wikipedia user and wish to confirm the verification, please leave a note at the VRT noticeboard.

Ticket: 2018083110007913

The Attic

This section is pinned and will not be automatically archived.

Per ticket:2018083110007913, all present and future prose on the Attic is licensed under under both the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported license and the GNU Free Documentation License. — JJMC89 (T·C) 23:55, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Bewat, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! -David Schaich ^Talk/_Cont 22:12, 2 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Bewat, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Quis separabit? 18:42, 27 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

May 2015

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to April 23 may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

*[[1875]] – [[JMW Turner], English artist (d. 1851)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 14:19, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

JMW Turner

Please desist from adding an unsourced date of birth to J.M.W. Turner, whose date of birth is unknown per the article and only his baptismal date is known. If you have a reliable source for the purported 23 April date of birth it must be added and will be reviewed. This was not the bot's mistake, either. You did not format your edits properly. I am not sure if you are editing in good faith but in the event you are I have left a welcome message above with recommended material for you to read to learn how to create articles, edit, etc. properly. Yours, Quis separabit? 18:42, 27 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:40, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Bewat. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Bewat. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem on George E. Ohr

Content you added to the above article appears to have been copied from https://www.smithsonianmag.com/arts-culture/the-mad-potter-of-biloxi-106065115/ or elsewhere online. Copying text directly from a source is a copyright violation. Unfortunately, for copyright reasons, some of the content had to be removed. All content you add to Wikipedia must be written in your own words. Please leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 13:10, 14 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

July 2018

Your addition to W. E. B. Du Bois has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 03:10, 28 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your addition to William Wallace Lincoln has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 03:13, 28 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

August 2018

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without evidence of permission. You have been previously warned that this is against policy, but have persisted. Please take this opportunity to ensure that you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 00:03, 14 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have blocked your account, because in spite of repeated warnings, you continued to add copyright material to this wiki in violation of our copyright policy and copyright law. You cannot resume editing until you provide a clear statement that demonstrates that you have read and understand our copyright policy and intend to follow it in the future. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 00:04, 14 August 2018 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Bewat (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #22417 was submitted on Aug 20, 2018 18:59:24. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 18:59, 20 August 2018 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Bewat (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #22436 was submitted on Aug 22, 2018 22:20:16. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 22:20, 22 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Bewat (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Beginning in July I edited several Wikipedia pages, adding a single quote to each and citing my website The Attic as the source, under references. Some of these have been flagged for copyright violation. But many have not been flagged, and one earned a thank you from a previous editor. I am appealing this block because I see no difference between the style or usage of any of the quotes, nor does citing a single quote seem to me a violation of copyright. My own books, "Freedom Summer" and "Sacco and Vanzetti," have been quoted and cited on Wikipedia, always without my permission or knowledge. I am simply doing what seems to me to be common practice here and I believe it comes under copyright law’s “fair use” compliance. As to fair use, I believe The Attic qualifies because: 1) it is a free site 2). The quotes are short, well within Fair Use length restrictions 3). Full citation is given. If my appeal is accepted, I intend to continue adding a quote or two to articles that relate to those I write for The Attic. I make no money from the site; in fact it has lost a few hundred dollars a month since January 2017 when it opened. I do The Attic in the same spirit Wikipedia is done, for the edification of general readers. In my 30 years of work as a journalist and author, I routinely used quotes in the manner described above. I am bewildered by these allegations of copyright violation. No editor of books or magazines that I know of would consider my use to violate copyright laws. (BTW, the first violation you cited was for plagiarizing a Smithsonian article on potter George Ohr. I wrote the original article.) If what I have done is a violation of copyright, I am left to wonder how any quotes ever get placed on Wikipedia. And I am especially bewildered by why some of my quote additions got flagged and others didn't when, to my knowledge, the format, length, and sources were exactly the same. I hope this appeal is not too long. I apologize for any violations inadvertently committed and I wait your reply and explanation.

Accept reason:

see below — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 00:38, 30 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You weren't blocked for adding quotations. You were blocked for adding material from this website. You added the paragraph starting "For its first decade...", most of the next paragraph starting "Schulz’s book “Happiness is a Warm Puppy”", the entire next three paragraphs. None of it was framed as a quotation. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 19:28, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Bewat (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

After 30 years in journalism, I was pulled up short to be accused of plagiarizing material from a Website. Until I clicked on the website. And there was my website -- The Attic. Yes, I freely admit that the entire paragraph was lifted, without quotation, from my own Website, The Attic. I wrote the original article on Snoopy, then used the exact words on Wikipedia. I had no idea it was a copyright violation to use your own words in different contexts and on different sites. (Historians do it in books all the time.). However please let me know if this violates Wikipedia rules and, if so, I will not do so again. I will confine myself to adding quotes to Wikipedia articles related to those in The Attic. However, while this Snoopy paragraph is why I was blocked, other previous edits were reverted. I hope you can explain any of those, how such might be avoided IF my editing privileges are restored, and what else I might be able to do to get them restored. Meanwhile, here is a link to About the Attic Master revealing me as the author of all 60+ pieces on The Attic. https://www.theattic.space/about-the-attic-master/

Accept reason:

I believe you when you say The Attic is your own website. See below for more information. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 00:38, 30 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

In order to protect the rights of copyright holders, we need to have documentation that shows the copyright holders have given permission for the material to be copied to this website. Wikipedia has procedures in place for this purpose. Please see WP:Donating copyrighted materials for an explanation of how to do it. There's a sample permission email at WP:Consent. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 21:35, 29 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I am sure you are the owner of The Attic website. However, as soon as you publish material online (or anywhere else for that matter), it enjoys copyright protection, whether it is tagged as such or not. Our rules require that for us to accept submissions, they have to be compatibly licensed. We have to have proof that the material has been released under a compatible license, either via the OTRS email system, or by the copyright holder placing a compatible license on the source webpage. Regarding the Smithsonian article, what normally happens is as soon as you sell it to them, they own the copyright, and it's no longer okay for you to publish it somewhere else without their permission. Please have a look at our copyright rules before you resume editing, and don't add anything that's been previously published unless and until the proper licensing is in place. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 00:38, 30 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The main pages I want you to look at are WP:Donating copyright materials and Wikipedia:Copyrights. Please let me know on my talk page if you have any questions. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 00:43, 30 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: The account holder's identity is documented in ticket:2018083110007913. — JJMC89 (T·C) 23:32, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Bewat. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 14:27, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Not just a copyright question, maybe

Hi

Thank you for your contributions. Leaving aside all the copyright-related stuff above, are you sure that your website is considered to be a reliable source per Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources and Wikipedia:Verifiability? I wonder because you likely had references for the text on your website, and could just add these original references as references in the Wikipedia article. Is there a specific reason for not doing so, or for additionally linking to a potentially unreliable source?

Thank you very much in advance for clarification. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 14:32, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Reliable Sources Noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is theattic.space. Thank you. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 15:20, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Bewat. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:09, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Using theattic.space as a source

Hi, I noticed that nearly all your contributions to articles are references your own blog, theattic.space – this could be problematic under 1. conflict of interest (WP:COI); 2. using Wikipedia to promote your own blog (WP:NOTPROMOTION & WP:CITESPAM); 3. theattic.com may not be a reliable source as it lacks editorial oversight and you are not a recognized expert (WP:QS & WP:BLOGS); 4. it could be inferred that you are a single purpose account (WP:SPA) who is not here to build an encyclopedia (WP:NOTHERE) – according to Wikipedia Blocking Policy (WP:BLOCKPOL), not here to build an encyclopedia is a common rationale for blocking – I would recommend that if you want to add content to articles that you support your edits with properly cited references (WP:CITE) to reliable published sources (WP:RS & WP:VERIFY), using secondary sources and not primary sources (WP:PSTS), and do not use your own blog as a source – there was a discussion on the reliability of theattic.space as a source on Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 248 (Sept 2018) and theattic.space was not added to the list of reliable sources (WP:RSPS) – you were previously advised on "Managing a conflict of interest" on your Talk page (Sept 2018) – thanks – Epinoia (talk) 00:28, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

New message from ToBeFree

Hello, Bewat. You have new messages at ToBeFree's talk page.
Message added 14:53, 5 June 2020 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

~ ToBeFree (talk) 14:53, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

(new message added) ~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:00, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:40, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 31

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 1955 in the United States, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Howl. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 1

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited August 1958, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page A Great Day in Harlem.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:50, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:13, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]