User talk:BettyBrahman

TM as a specific meditational practice is a Hindu, tantric practice.

TM as a specific meditational practice is a Hindu, tantric practice and this is a well established fact. For example see the writings Swami Sivananda for details on mental mantra meditation and use of bija mantras. Numerous published pundits discuss this, as well as at least one TM court case where a reputable Hindu swami and guru testified to this very fact as an expert witness.

School practice is also revelvant due to past court rulings and current events.

The school controversy also needs to remain, esp. since it represents a current topic, as well as one in the past which received much media attention--as well as legal action which is also significant in regards to "TM as religious activity"/separation of church and state. The precendent of previous court decisions had determined that TM was religious, again another very relevant, albeit controversial, issue.

Maybe it does - but why inundate the TM article with it? It was already sitting at the most appropriate place.

Peterklutz 00:07, 27 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

May 2007

Please do not add unhelpful and unconstructive content to Wikipedia, as you did to Patañjali. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Buddhipriya 06:41, 22 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

3RR

Hi Betty. You are by my count at 3RR. Please check WP:Revert for further information. If you revert again you risk being blocked. Thanks. (olive (talk) 20:18, 30 May 2009 (UTC))[reply]

Unfortunately your recent revert puts you at 4RR. (olive (talk) 20:39, 30 May 2009 (UTC))[reply]

I count three reverts, which is more than ideal but not a direct violation of the policy. I encourage all parties to use the talk page to discuss rather than reverting. Will Beback talk 22:28, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]