User talk:BetoTheDJ

Welcome!

Hi BetoTheDJ! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Capitals00 (talk) 20:34, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Capitals00 thanks! BetoTheDJ (talk) 21:02, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Thakzin

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Thakzin, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Bbb23 (talk) 15:32, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why you nominating a draft article? you do know that it can be improved and most information hasn't been properly formatted yet which is why im submitting it so that other editors can help in improving it. but the topic obviously shouldn't be in any harm of being speedy deleted. BetoTheDJ (talk) 16:46, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Recovering a Deleted Draft Article

This request for help from administrators has been answered. If you need more help or have additional questions, please reapply the {{admin help}} template, or contact the responding user(s) directly on their own user talk page.

i need help recovering Draft:Thakzin as it was deleted and i would like to work on the tone of that article because that was the reason it was deleted. i didn't write it in a neutral point of view the first time and i did it the proper way through AfC but will fix it once it can be recovered to my sandbox. i submitted it via Afc so i dont know why they would delete it. If they moved it to my Sandbox i would've gladly fixed the tone of the article unless im missing something? BetoTheDJ (talk) 18:19, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ask the deleting administrator, Jimfbleak.--Bbb23 (talk) 18:30, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your userpage

Please note that you are not allowed to file your userpage in article categories alongside real articles. You may file it in Category:Wikipedians in South Africa (which has all kinds of userbox templates for you to choose from, and even numerous subcategories by state or city) if you wish, but you may not file it in Category:South African people, because that category is for articles, not editors' userpages. Bearcat (talk) 17:21, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

April 2024

Hello, I'm Belbury. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Benchmarking (hobby) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Those sentences need the parentheses. Belbury (talk) 18:56, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi User:Belbury , Now that i look at it again it does actually need the parentheses! haha my bad at first it just looked wrong and it made more sense visually. but next time i'll be more careful and always take a second read before making the edit i want to make. Thanks for looking out for a brother, Belbury! BetoTheDJ (talk) 19:09, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Ponyo^{bons mots} 20:16, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user is asking that his block be reviewed

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

BetoTheDJ (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have done no harm but try to help control the amount of new pages being added to wiki by tagging the one note in proper condition for encyclopedia, as well as doing my regular suggested edits. anybody can see that im not associate to the person who im being accused of as socket puppet. Can i please get another chance and promise i wont do tagging anymore only suggested edits. please Wikipedia just became my place of peace and a place i can feel at home. i love reading and i try to make 5 useful edits to a maximum of 10 a day if i have abit more time and can help where i can. BetoTheDJ (talk) 20:46, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

It's patently obvious you're a sock. I've revoked TPA; you can request an unblock with your master account, a lot of good it will do you. Bbb23 (talk) 20:53, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.