User talk:BethAppleton

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, BethAppleton. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Jaxsta, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. SamX (talk) 05:03, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi SamX

Thanks for this message. I am the CEO as you will recognise from my login and I am trying to clean up this page as there are elements that are promotional and not our business and also there are some aspects that would be great to include and I would love your guidance and assistance to ensure that they are factual, references and not promotional. Wikipedia is an incredible source because it is the truth. I will add comments via talk so we can check together? Is that the right process?

Thanks

Beth BethAppleton (talk) 01:12, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @BethAppleton. Please read the whole box of helpful information @SamX already left for you. You must disclose your COI, you shouldn’t create or edit articles about things you’re related to, and don’t spam links. - 🔥𝑰𝒍𝒍𝒖𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝑭𝒍𝒂𝒎𝒆 (𝒕𝒂𝒍𝒌)🔥 01:14, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this draft. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.

BethAppleton (talk · contribs) This user has declared a connection. ((Optional) https://themusicnetwork.com/beth-appleton-promoted-ceo-jaxsta/Insert relevant affiliations, disclosures, article drafts or diffs showing COI contributions.)

BethAppleton (talk) 01:24, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please replace the “ Insert relevant affiliations, disclosures, article drafts or diffs showing COI contributions.” with that relevant info and add it to your user page. - 🔥𝑰𝒍𝒍𝒖𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝑭𝒍𝒂𝒎𝒆 (𝒕𝒂𝒍𝒌)🔥 01:28, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, the {{connected contributor}} template belongs on the talk page of the article (Talk:Jaxsta). --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 06:05, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Fortress Games (March 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Zxcvbnm were:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The article is written like WP:PROMOTION, is very in-universe in parts, and does not show proof it passes WP:GNG.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Fortress Games and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 09:01, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Fortress Games (March 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Zxcvbnm were:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Some sources and content continue to be inappropriate - please read the guidelines.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Fortress Games and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 07:38, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Fortress Games (April 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Far from appropriate even after numerous declines. Please address WP:COI

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Fortress Games and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Greenman (talk) 11:03, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, BethAppleton! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Greenman (talk) 11:03, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Fortress Games (May 4)

Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Zxcvbnm was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: I still cannot confirm it is notable, but even if it is, the promotional language requires massive rewrites to make this a viable article. Please look for assistance on how to remedy the article if you wish to keep working on it.

ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 10:59, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]