User talk:Betaman12

May 2016

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Menopause. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. clpo13_(talk) 22:21, 21 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Betaman12 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i have stated all the main things i wanted to say on [[1]] so i will just add this which i wanted to add and was typing before it got decided and was accused of sock and that is it since i am on public wifi and i have to go i am not a meta average menopause age is 48-55 and apparently unkownzero agreed to since he/she changed it after jytdog changed it back i reverted it because he/she said refs were not credible so i looked over it and deemed the refs were so i reverted it back and said please discuss per wp:brd since from what i understand that is what you put discus changes to wiki articles in general or i could be wrong and as i said on the view history page of menopause what just because i agree with someone that means is sock but if you want to consider that evidence fine then what about cpo13 and jytdog as i said on spi (I think cpo13 is jytdog when he reveted 3rd time he/she said they were gong to fill out spi and now a little while later 5 min cpo13 did that and even reverted the edits on menopause page then 25 min later jytdog followed up on a spi himself or herself) also on the menopause page not a few minutes after I reverted again cpo13 came in and reverted back to jytdog i now this is not going to make a difference anyway since i have already been blocked i could always create another account when i get home on my wifi but i will not it is not worth it i do not care at this point if you believe me or not but apparently what i here about wiki is true full of idiots who defends fales info and accuse and block people based on false bullshit accusations just because there information was wrong and was deleted

Decline reason:

This unblock request is incoherent. The bits that are coherent don't seem to address the reason for your block. Yamla (talk) 01:17, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.