User talk:Betahatdelta

August 2020

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Cat food has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Cat food was changed by Betahatdelta (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.86352 on 2020-08-23T09:36:20+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 09:36, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Cat health. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Cat health was changed by Betahatdelta (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.851218 on 2020-08-23T09:46:18+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 09:46, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Cat food, you may be blocked from editing. — Jeff G. ツ 15:35, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Review my sandbox page

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Can an admin help review my sandbox article please?

I've left some very brief comments on your sandbox talk page. We do actually have a system in place to get feedback on draft articles, known as Articles for Creation. If you want more feedback, I suggest adding {{subst:submit}} to the top of your draft, as that will attract the attention of those experienced in reviewing drafts. stwalkerster (talk) 12:07, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for your feedback. I have updated and added sources. Also tagged the draft as advised. Please can you let me know if the article can be published now? Many thanks, Bhaskar.

Your thread has been archived

Hi Betahatdelta! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, I have created my draft of a biography of a living person, what is the next step?, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.

The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Krishna Dhar (November 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Kohlrabi Pickle was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

It's not clear from the article what makes the subject notable. Also, the article cannot simply be a restatement of all his work.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Krishna Dhar and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Krishna Dhar, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Kohlrabi Pickle (talk) 07:17, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Betahatdelta! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Kohlrabi Pickle (talk) 07:17, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Betahatdelta! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, I have a few questions about my draft that got rejected, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.

The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Krishna Dhar has been accepted

Krishna Dhar, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Cerebellum (talk) 13:30, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]