User talk:Beta Lohman/Archive 2
 | This is an archive of past discussions about User:Beta Lohman. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 |
Disambiguation link notification for January 29
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Little Things (2021 film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Decider.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
 | Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
The article Burning Kiss has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non notable film
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 00:13, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
I have dePRODed the article, because I think the subject deserves wider input by the community before it gets deleted (or not). However, it does need more content to make it easier to defend it staying. I would recommend the addition of more independent reliably sourced material if you can do so. Regards. Aoziwe (talk) 12:12, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks for the change. --Beta Lohman (talk) 10:19, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
- I added some sources and expanded the article. Now I think the notability has been raised. --Beta Lohman (talk) 21:38, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
- I am not at all sure that there is enough in the article, in fact I think not yet. But there is I think possibly sufficient WP:NEXIST. Note that International Business Times seems to have mixed reliability. You may wish to look through these and, possibly in particular, these, perhaps especially The Australian but it has a paywall. Aoziwe (talk) 09:50, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
- The posts from the Australian are invisible unless the paywall is unlocked. And why does IBTimes seem not to have enough reliability? What page can I check on the Wikipedia? --Beta Lohman (talk) 10:11, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
- You can look at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources and look at Wikipedia:Deprecated sources. And, in the case of IBT there is also International Business Times#Content quality. Aoziwe (talk) 12:04, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
- The posts from the Australian are invisible unless the paywall is unlocked. And why does IBTimes seem not to have enough reliability? What page can I check on the Wikipedia? --Beta Lohman (talk) 10:11, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
- I am not at all sure that there is enough in the article, in fact I think not yet. But there is I think possibly sufficient WP:NEXIST. Note that International Business Times seems to have mixed reliability. You may wish to look through these and, possibly in particular, these, perhaps especially The Australian but it has a paywall. Aoziwe (talk) 09:50, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
- Besides, I will remove the template of notability. As I think the reliable sources are given enough. --Beta Lohman (talk) 10:12, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Archiving a talk page
Please, in the future, do NOT archive a talk page by moving it. This is has borked the page history, which should have remained at the main talk page. Please see WP:ARCHIVE. ~Cheers, TenTonParasol 04:12, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
- What to do next? Undo the edit? --Beta Lohman (talk) 04:17, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
- I've sought administrator help over at WP:ANI! Hopefully they'll know how or who to contact. Also, I think I came across too harsh bc I forgot that I'm overly plainspoken, and I apologize if I came off as harsh or stressed you out in any way! It's not a huge deal just very not-ideal. (Especially with how that page as, as you can see, a long history and subject to some disputes.) I am VERY curious why it didn't auto-archive though, so I'll into seeing how to get the bot that usually does it to start archiving it properly. ~Cheers, TenTonParasol 04:24, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
- So the talk page can't leave a message, and it has to wait until the administrator fixes it?--Beta Lohman (talk) 04:26, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
Do not move pages this way, it is absolutely disruptive and will draw sanctions if it is repeated. I've restored the page. you are a bit new to be deciding when things should be archived, and the method you chose is absolutely the wrong method, and breaks things. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 14:58, 6 March 2022 (UTC)