User talk:BergamottenTee

January 2021

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. --HistoryofIran (talk) 21:49, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

February 2021

Hello, I'm FDW777. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Operations Claw-Eagle and Tiger, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you.

Random people on Twitter are not references. FDW777 (talk) 08:02, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest you read WP:SPS and WP:ABOUTSELF. I repeat, random people on Twitter are not references. FDW777 (talk) 08:30, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Lightspecs. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Operation Claw-Eagle 2 seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Lightspecs (talk) 08:24, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. FDW777 (talk) 11:36, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Operation Claw-Eagle 2. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Shadow4dark (talk) 11:37, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make personal attacks on other people. Comment on content, not on fellow editors. Shadow4dark (talk) 12:21, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There was no personal attack claiming to blow up the entire cave with drone munitions is first class trolismCengizsogutlu (talk) 12:32, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

He calls other users "trolls" Shadow4dark (talk) 12:55, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at Operation Claw-Eagle 2. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Random political commentary like "You said Turkey was defeated, when Turkey is so powerful and strong. Ha, PKK troll, Turkey bombs everything!" "Des Vallee is Joke" "Des Vallee is a PKK Troll" "Exclude Des Vallee from talk" is not allowed, don't bring up personal commentary, what matters is the source not your position. Des Vallee (talk) 18:28, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Operation Claw-Eagle 2. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges on that page. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges.

Des Vallee (talk) 19:15, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ANI Notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Des Vallee (talk) 02:24, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for edit warring, personal attacks and threats to other editors.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Black Kite (talk) 02:32, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]