User talk:BerenjenAzul

Welcome!

Hello, BerenjenAzul, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! 2602:306:3357:BA0:C55D:A696:A8C6:A172 (talk) 19:01, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Astrid Heeren

The article Astrid Heeren has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not multiple major roles, her role in Silent Night, Bloody Night is as a supporting actor, but The Thomas Crown Affair seems to be a very minor role

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — Insert CleverPhrase Here 22:24, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

C. Marcella Carollo

@BerenjenAzul:, hello. My name is Eggishorn and I wanted to thank you for your edits at C. Marcella Carollo and let you know I adjusted it to fit some policies and procedures. There were some minor English grammar or style issues which are of no real concern. That said, you may want to peruse the Manual of Style at some time.

I also fixed some oddities in the referencing templates and moved the references to cite the statements correctly. Saying "According to news reports..." with two references doesn't adequately indicate to the reader which source said what. This also means that I had to adjust the text to reflect what each source said separately. Combining what two sources say into one statement that does not reflect what either one explicitly says is a way to potentially violate the No Original Research and Biographies of Living Persons policies.

I don't believe that these changes, taken as a whole, substantially change the meaning of the text you had added, I just wanted you to be aware of some of the possible pitfalls and explain why I change it. Thanks again, and I hope you stick around. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 15:12, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Joe Cuba Album El Alcalde del Barrio.jpeg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Joe Cuba Album El Alcalde del Barrio.jpeg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 18:09, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

April 2020

Hi BerenjenAzul! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Ottawa Treaty that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia — it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. Wikiacc (¶) 15:40, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]