User talk:Bercowich

Genre capitalization

Hi -- if you're interested, I've started a discussion at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Albums for capitalization of genres... Just thought you'd want to know since you joined the fray at [{Death Magnetic]]...

Warning

Please provide sources and/or a WP:CONSENSUS on the discussion page next time you change a genre. Continuous genre changes without reaching the aforementioned criteria may result in blocks. If you have any concerns or queries, please feel free to contact me. Thank you. Scarian ^{Call me Pat!} 15:37, 1 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Just because you write an edit summary does not mean you have the sources to change a genre. If you continue to change genres without a SOURCE (and by source, I mean a website, or a book, or a newspaper article; I do not mean your opinion). Please stop and just talk to me, okay? I can help you contribute to Wikipedia more constructively if you just reply to me. Remember: No more genre changes please. Scarian ^{Call me Pat!} 20:44, 1 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

May 2009

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. The Real Libs-speak politely 15:09, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Infoboxes

Hi. There has been extensive debate over the use of infoboxes on musicians, bands, albums and singles. One of the upshots has been a clear consensus that as the infobox is a summary of the key points of the article, which should be using a reliable source for the information. For genres, we frequently accept those listed in the links of reviews listed in the information box, providing your own opinion is not acceptable, regardless of whether your synthesis is right or wrong: Wikipedia relies on verifiability. A better approach is to find a decent review that discusses the genre(s) in context and write this up in the article, then the addition of said genre(s) into the infobox is then supported by cited text. Thanks.--Alf ^melmac 09:31, 22 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to blocking of editing privileges. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. GripTheHusk (talk) 03:03, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing.

Proposed deletion of Jesu Død

The article Jesu Død has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

no indication that this meets WP:NSONGS

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. RadioFan (talk) 15:38, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

September 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Jesu Død has been reverted, as it appears to have removed content from the page without explanation. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Ali ^(t)_(c) 19:39, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of War (Burzum song)

The article War (Burzum song) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication that this meets WP:NSONGS

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Erzsébet Báthory_{(talk|contr.)} 02:15, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

October 2009

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. The Real Libs-speak politely 16:14, 5 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:07, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]